MDGCX vs. FAMRX
MDGCX (BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.) and FAMRX (Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund) are both mutual funds - MDGCX is a Global Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while FAMRX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, MDGCX returned 12.39%/yr vs 11.84%/yr for FAMRX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDGCX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FAMRX.
Performance
MDGCX vs. FAMRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDGCX achieves a 18.00% return, which is significantly higher than FAMRX's 14.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MDGCX having a 12.39% annualized return and FAMRX not far behind at 11.84%.
MDGCX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 18.00%
- 6M
- 18.99%
- 1Y
- 38.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
FAMRX
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 15.08%
- 1Y
- 30.85%
- 3Y*
- 18.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
MDGCX vs. FAMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. | 18.00% | 23.61% | 10.87% | 22.43% | -17.94% | 17.52% | 15.61% | 25.54% | -11.73% | 23.41% |
FAMRX Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund | 14.24% | 20.87% | 12.60% | 18.98% | -18.55% | 17.10% | 19.37% | 26.26% | -9.21% | 21.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDGCX and FAMRX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 1999 | 0.89 |
The correlation between MDGCX and FAMRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDGCX vs. FAMRX — Risk / Return Rank
MDGCX
FAMRX
MDGCX vs. FAMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDGCX | FAMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.43 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.72 | 3.27 | +1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.69 | 14.19 | +6.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDGCX vs. FAMRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDGCX drawdown since its inception was -48.25%, smaller than the maximum FAMRX drawdown of -58.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDGCX and FAMRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDGCX | FAMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.25% | -58.65% | +10.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.07% | -9.33% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.46% | -15.35% | -6.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.68% | -26.00% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.87% | -30.96% | -3.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | 0.00% | -1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.92% | -12.30% | +2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 2.15% | -0.31% |
Volatility
MDGCX vs. FAMRX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) have volatilities of 5.33% and 5.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDGCX | FAMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 5.49% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.02% | 11.02% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.31% | 13.11% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 14.79% | +1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 15.33% | +1.95% |
MDGCX vs. FAMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDGCX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FAMRX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDGCX vs. FAMRX - Dividend Comparison
MDGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, more than FAMRX's 4.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMRX Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund | 4.87% | 5.56% | 3.44% | 1.33% | 5.07% | 3.15% | 1.99% | 5.52% | 5.62% | 2.31% | 0.28% | 4.83% |
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. | 7.55% | 8.91% | 7.78% | 1.42% | 1.75% | 16.75% | 3.77% | 1.73% | 4.06% | 34.82% | 0.65% | 5.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, MDGCX and FAMRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FAMRX has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to MDGCX (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDGCX dropped -48.25% vs FAMRX's -58.65%.
MDGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDGCX and FAMRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer