PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDGCX vs. FAMRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDGCX vs. FAMRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDGCX achieves a 18.00% return, which is significantly higher than FAMRX's 14.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MDGCX having a 12.39% annualized return and FAMRX not far behind at 11.84%.


MDGCX

1D
0.80%
1M
1.90%
YTD
18.00%
6M
18.99%
1Y
38.42%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
11.76%
10Y*
12.39%

FAMRX

1D
1.41%
1M
2.58%
YTD
14.24%
6M
15.08%
1Y
30.85%
3Y*
18.17%
5Y*
10.08%
10Y*
11.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDGCX vs. FAMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDGCX
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.
18.00%23.61%10.87%22.43%-17.94%17.52%15.61%25.54%-11.73%23.41%
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
14.24%20.87%12.60%18.98%-18.55%17.10%19.37%26.26%-9.21%21.08%

Correlation

The correlation between MDGCX and FAMRX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 1999

0.89

The correlation between MDGCX and FAMRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDGCX vs. FAMRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDGCX
MDGCX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MDGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MDGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FAMRX
FAMRX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FAMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FAMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDGCX vs. FAMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDGCXFAMRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.43

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.72

3.27

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.69

14.19

+6.49

MDGCX vs. FAMRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDGCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is comparable to the FAMRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDGCX and FAMRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDGCX vs. FAMRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDGCX drawdown since its inception was -48.25%, smaller than the maximum FAMRX drawdown of -58.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDGCX and FAMRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDGCXFAMRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.25%

-58.65%

+10.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

-9.33%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.46%

-15.35%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.68%

-26.00%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.87%

-30.96%

-3.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

0.00%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.92%

-12.30%

+2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

2.15%

-0.31%

Volatility

MDGCX vs. FAMRX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) have volatilities of 5.33% and 5.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDGCXFAMRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

5.49%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.02%

11.02%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.31%

13.11%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

14.79%

+1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

15.33%

+1.95%

MDGCX vs. FAMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDGCX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FAMRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDGCX vs. FAMRX - Dividend Comparison

MDGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, more than FAMRX's 4.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
4.87%5.56%3.44%1.33%5.07%3.15%1.99%5.52%5.62%2.31%0.28%4.83%
MDGCX
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.
7.55%8.91%7.78%1.42%1.75%16.75%3.77%1.73%4.06%34.82%0.65%5.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, MDGCX and FAMRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FAMRX has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to MDGCX (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDGCX dropped -48.25% vs FAMRX's -58.65%.

MDGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDGCX and FAMRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer