PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDFGX vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDFGX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund (MDFGX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDFGX achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 17.57% return. Over the past 10 years, MDFGX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 16.67%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.79% annualized return.


MDFGX

1D
2.30%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
8.54%
6M
10.22%
1Y
20.45%
3Y*
22.77%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
16.67%

QQQ

1D
0.59%
1M
0.22%
YTD
17.57%
6M
17.85%
1Y
37.55%
3Y*
26.43%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
21.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDFGX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDFGX
BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund
8.54%12.63%31.58%48.77%-37.83%20.78%40.16%31.89%1.81%32.37%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
17.57%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between MDFGX and QQQ is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999

0.89

The correlation between MDFGX and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDFGX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDFGX
MDFGX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MDFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
MDFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDFGX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund (MDFGX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDFGXQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.37

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

3.01

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.80

11.22

-7.42

MDFGX vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDFGX and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDFGX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDFGX drawdown since its inception was -47.99%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDFGX and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDFGXQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.99%

-82.97%

+34.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.74%

-11.96%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.43%

-22.77%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.49%

-35.12%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.49%

-35.12%

-7.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.14%

-3.33%

-2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.22%

-32.75%

+21.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.99%

3.20%

+1.79%

Volatility

MDFGX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund (MDFGX) is 6.95%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that MDFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDFGXQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.95%

7.56%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.60%

13.81%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.18%

17.19%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.57%

22.55%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.58%

22.38%

+0.20%

MDFGX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDFGX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDFGX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

MDFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.98%, more than QQQ's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDFGX
BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund
17.98%19.51%12.73%3.59%9.46%12.95%5.46%10.67%14.31%12.51%4.01%11.22%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, MDFGX and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQQ has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to MDFGX (6.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDFGX dropped -47.99% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDFGX and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer