MDEV vs. PJP
MDEV (First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF) and PJP (Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - MDEV tracks the Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index while PJP tracks the Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MDEV returned -2.86%/yr vs 13.31%/yr for PJP. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDEV charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PJP.
Performance
MDEV vs. PJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDEV achieves a -11.48% return, which is significantly lower than PJP's 2.90% return.
MDEV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- -11.48%
- 6M
- -12.29%
- 1Y
- -7.05%
- 3Y*
- -2.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PJP
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 34.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.31%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
MDEV vs. PJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | -11.48% | 2.00% | 1.79% | 7.55% | -28.59% | 4.16% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 2.90% | 27.98% | 9.63% | -2.18% | -2.16% | 2.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDEV and PJP is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.62 |
The correlation between MDEV and PJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDEV vs. PJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDEV
PJP
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
MDEV
PJP
Basic Materials
MDEV
-
PJP
-
Communication Services
MDEV
-
PJP
-
Consumer Cyclical
MDEV
-
PJP
-
Consumer Defensive
MDEV
-
PJP
-
Energy
MDEV
-
PJP
-
Financial Services
MDEV
-
PJP
-
Industrials
MDEV
-
PJP
-
Real Estate
MDEV
-
PJP
-
Technology
MDEV
-
PJP
-
Utilities
MDEV
-
PJP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDEV vs. PJP — Risk / Return Rank
MDEV
PJP
MDEV vs. PJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV) and Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDEV | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.36 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 3.70 | -4.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 11.55 | -12.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDEV | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 2.13 | -2.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.32 | 0.59 | -0.91 |
Drawdowns
MDEV vs. PJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDEV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, which is greater than PJP's maximum drawdown of -37.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDEV and PJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDEV | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.34% | -37.06% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.13% | -9.44% | -8.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.50% | -16.27% | -6.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.76% | -2.94% | -30.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.65% | -8.85% | -16.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.22% | 3.02% | +4.20% |
Volatility
MDEV vs. PJP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV) is 4.60%, while Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) has a volatility of 5.33%. This indicates that MDEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDEV | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 5.33% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | 12.02% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.00% | 16.38% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 16.17% | +2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 18.39% | +0.59% |
MDEV vs. PJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDEV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PJP's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDEV vs. PJP - Dividend Comparison
MDEV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.99% | 0.98% | 0.97% | 1.01% | 0.95% | 0.81% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.12% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 5.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDEV and PJP have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PJP has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to MDEV (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDEV dropped -42.34% vs PJP's -37.06%.
On 3-year performance, PJP leads with 13.31% vs -2.86% for MDEV. On fees, PJP is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, MDEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PJP has performed better with a 13.31% return vs -2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PJP is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for MDEV.
PJP has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for MDEV.
MDEV tracks Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index, while PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for MDEV and 0.58% for PJP.
PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDEV and PJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer