MDEV vs. FXH
MDEV (First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF) and FXH (First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from First Trust - MDEV tracks the Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index while FXH tracks the StrataQuant Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MDEV returned -5.05%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for FXH. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MDEV charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FXH.
Performance
MDEV vs. FXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDEV achieves a -1.23% return, which is significantly lower than FXH's 12.75% return.
MDEV
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- 4.66%
- 6M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- -1.23%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- 0.95%
- 5Y*
- -5.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.86%
FXH
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 11.87%
- YTD
- 12.75%
- 1Y
- 30.98%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- 1.03%
- 10Y*
- 7.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.23M | $7.53M | $5.49M | |
| $145.59K | $80.86K | $64.49K |
MDEV vs. FXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | -1.23% | 2.00% | 1.79% | 7.55% | -28.59% | 3.83% |
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 12.75% | 10.16% | 0.96% | -4.53% | -12.24% | 6.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDEV and FXH is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between MDEV and FXH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDEV vs. FXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDEV
FXH
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
MDEV
FXH
Basic Materials
MDEV
-
FXH
-
Communication Services
MDEV
-
FXH
-
Consumer Cyclical
MDEV
-
FXH
-
Consumer Defensive
MDEV
-
FXH
-
Energy
MDEV
-
FXH
-
Financial Services
MDEV
-
FXH
-
Industrials
MDEV
-
FXH
-
Real Estate
MDEV
-
FXH
-
Technology
MDEV
-
FXH
Utilities
MDEV
-
FXH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDEV vs. FXH — Risk / Return Rank
MDEV
FXH
MDEV vs. FXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV) and First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDEV | FXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.33 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 2.55 | -2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.61 | 7.98 | -7.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDEV vs. FXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDEV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, roughly equal to the maximum FXH drawdown of -43.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDEV and FXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDEV | FXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.34% | -43.70% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.13% | -12.20% | -5.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.43% | -17.53% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.34% | -29.49% | -12.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.08% | -0.24% | -25.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.80% | -9.41% | -16.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.46% | 3.89% | +4.57% |
Volatility
MDEV vs. FXH - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) at 4.86%. This indicates that MDEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDEV | FXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 4.86% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.98% | 12.08% | +0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.53% | 16.25% | +0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 16.72% | +2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.99% | 18.51% | +0.48% |
MDEV vs. FXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDEV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FXH's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDEV vs. FXH - Dividend Comparison
MDEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than FXH's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 0.80% | 0.75% | 0.41% | 0.24% | 0.20% |
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDEV and FXH have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDEV has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to FXH (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDEV dropped -42.34% vs FXH's -43.70%.
On 5-year performance, FXH leads with 1.03% vs -5.05% for MDEV. On fees, FXH is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, FXH has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FXH has performed better with a 1.03% return vs -5.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FXH is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for MDEV.
FXH has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.10% for MDEV.
MDEV tracks Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index, while FXH tracks StrataQuant Health Care Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for MDEV and 0.61% for FXH.
FXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDEV and FXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer