MDEGX vs. CSUAX
MDEGX (BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares) and CSUAX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - MDEGX is a Global Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while CSUAX is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. MDEGX is actively managed, while CSUAX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDEGX returned 11.70%/yr vs 7.23%/yr for CSUAX. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MDEGX charges 1.16%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for CSUAX.
Performance
MDEGX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDEGX achieves a 13.16% return, which is significantly higher than CSUAX's 12.43% return. Over the past 10 years, MDEGX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 11.70%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.23% annualized return.
MDEGX
- 1D
- 2.41%
- 1M
- -3.53%
- 6M
- 10.26%
- YTD
- 13.16%
- 1Y
- 16.38%
- 3Y*
- 12.92%
- 5Y*
- 8.45%
- 10Y*
- 11.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.04%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 8.01%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 17.62%
- 3Y*
- 11.66%
- 5Y*
- 7.33%
- 10Y*
- 7.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MDEGX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDEGX BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares | 13.16% | 12.11% | 7.27% | 33.16% | -20.47% | 20.42% | 16.28% | 32.46% | -4.81% | 24.48% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 12.43% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDEGX and CSUAX is 0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2005 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MDEGX and CSUAX has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDEGX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
MDEGX
CSUAX
MDEGX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares (MDEGX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDEGX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.32 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 3.07 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.49 | 9.66 | -5.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDEGX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDEGX drawdown since its inception was -48.79%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDEGX and CSUAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDEGX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.79% | -52.20% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -5.99% | -6.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.14% | -11.83% | -9.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.49% | -20.45% | -11.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.98% | -35.05% | +3.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.44% | -1.65% | -3.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -8.39% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 1.89% | +1.38% |
Volatility
MDEGX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares (MDEGX) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.00%. This indicates that MDEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDEGX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 3.00% | +3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.70% | 8.16% | +8.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.49% | 10.12% | +9.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 13.00% | +7.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 14.88% | +4.31% |
MDEGX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDEGX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDEGX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
MDEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, less than CSUAX's 7.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.61% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
MDEGX BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares | 6.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.18% | 22.48% | 6.30% | 11.68% | 8.21% | 3.81% | 0.62% | 7.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDEGX and CSUAX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDEGX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to CSUAX (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDEGX dropped -48.79% vs CSUAX's -52.20%.
CSUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDEGX and CSUAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer