MDCEX vs. MOOD
MDCEX (Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy) and MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 3 years, MDCEX returned 22.84%/yr vs 20.58%/yr for MOOD. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDCEX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MOOD.
Performance
MDCEX vs. MOOD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDCEX achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly lower than MOOD's 14.40% return.
MDCEX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 7.83%
- 6M
- 11.02%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
MOOD
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 14.40%
- 6M
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- 36.14%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDCEX vs. MOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDCEX Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy | 7.83% | 28.05% | 14.98% | 23.93% | -3.22% |
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 14.40% | 30.39% | 12.53% | 12.56% | -2.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDCEX and MOOD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2022 | 0.74 |
The correlation between MDCEX and MOOD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDCEX vs. MOOD — Risk / Return Rank
MDCEX
MOOD
MDCEX vs. MOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy (MDCEX) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDCEX | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.51 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 3.74 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | 11.60 | 0.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDCEX | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 2.57 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.35 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
MDCEX vs. MOOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDCEX drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, which is greater than MOOD's maximum drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDCEX and MOOD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDCEX | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.68% | -14.34% | -34.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.27% | -9.71% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.46% | -9.71% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.61% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.33% | -2.32% | -3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 3.12% | -0.70% |
Volatility
MDCEX vs. MOOD - Volatility Comparison
Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy (MDCEX) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) at 3.22%. This indicates that MDCEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDCEX | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 3.22% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.43% | 12.32% | -2.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.89% | 14.11% | -3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 12.07% | +1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 12.07% | +3.35% |
MDCEX vs. MOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDCEX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MOOD's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDCEX vs. MOOD - Dividend Comparison
MDCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.86%, more than MOOD's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDCEX Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy | 10.86% | 11.38% | 12.11% | 8.00% | 9.10% | 41.90% | 10.81% | 10.09% | 17.17% | 2.33% | 3.30% | 9.38% |
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 0.35% | 0.40% | 1.33% | 1.34% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDCEX and MOOD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDCEX has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to MOOD (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDCEX dropped -48.68% vs MOOD's -14.34%.
MDCEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDCEX and MOOD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer