PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDCEX vs. MOOD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDCEX vs. MOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy (MDCEX) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDCEX achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly lower than MOOD's 14.40% return.


MDCEX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.85%
YTD
7.83%
6M
11.02%
1Y
27.36%
3Y*
22.84%
5Y*
11.44%
10Y*
11.07%

MOOD

1D
-0.58%
1M
3.67%
YTD
14.40%
6M
16.67%
1Y
36.14%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDCEX vs. MOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MDCEX
Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy
7.83%28.05%14.98%23.93%-3.22%
MOOD
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
14.40%30.39%12.53%12.56%-2.90%

Correlation

The correlation between MDCEX and MOOD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2022

0.74

The correlation between MDCEX and MOOD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDCEX vs. MOOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDCEX
MDCEX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MDCEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDCEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDCEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MDCEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDCEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MOOD
MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDCEX vs. MOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy (MDCEX) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDCEXMOODDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.51

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

3.74

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.59

11.60

0.00

MDCEX vs. MOOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDCEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the MOOD Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDCEX and MOOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDCEXMOODDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

2.57

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

1.35

-0.70

Drawdowns

MDCEX vs. MOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDCEX drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, which is greater than MOOD's maximum drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDCEX and MOOD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDCEXMOODDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.68%

-14.34%

-34.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.27%

-9.71%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.46%

-9.71%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.61%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.33%

-2.32%

-3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

3.12%

-0.70%

Volatility

MDCEX vs. MOOD - Volatility Comparison

Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy (MDCEX) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) at 3.22%. This indicates that MDCEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDCEXMOODDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

3.22%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

12.32%

-2.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.89%

14.11%

-3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

12.07%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.42%

12.07%

+3.35%

MDCEX vs. MOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDCEX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MOOD's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDCEX vs. MOOD - Dividend Comparison

MDCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.86%, more than MOOD's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDCEX
Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy
10.86%11.38%12.11%8.00%9.10%41.90%10.81%10.09%17.17%2.33%3.30%9.38%
MOOD
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
0.35%0.40%1.33%1.34%1.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDCEX and MOOD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDCEX has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to MOOD (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDCEX dropped -48.68% vs MOOD's -14.34%.

MDCEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDCEX and MOOD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer