PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDCEX vs. GPIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDCEX vs. GPIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy (MDCEX) and GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDCEX achieves a 3.92% return, which is significantly higher than GPIFX's 1.86% return. Over the past 10 years, MDCEX has outperformed GPIFX with an annualized return of 10.14%, while GPIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.58% annualized return.


MDCEX

1D
1.11%
1M
-2.71%
6M
0.35%
YTD
3.92%
1Y
14.98%
3Y*
18.04%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
10.14%
ALL TIME*
8.86%

GPIFX

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.34%
6M
1.63%
YTD
1.86%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
0.06%
10Y*
2.58%
ALL TIME*
2.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MDCEX vs. GPIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDCEX
Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy
3.92%28.05%14.98%23.93%-6.59%12.61%-6.12%25.56%-9.04%20.71%
GPIFX
GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund
1.86%3.69%4.22%7.13%-14.14%1.17%15.17%6.64%-2.48%6.83%

Correlation

The correlation between MDCEX and GPIFX is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.39

The correlation between MDCEX and GPIFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDCEX vs. GPIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MDCEX
MDCEX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MDCEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDCEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDCEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MDCEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDCEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIFX
GPIFX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GPIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MDCEX vs. GPIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy (MDCEX) and GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDCEXGPIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.43

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

3.03

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.39

13.19

-7.80

MDCEX vs. GPIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDCEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the GPIFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDCEX and GPIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDCEX vs. GPIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDCEX drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, which is greater than GPIFX's maximum drawdown of -16.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDCEX and GPIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDCEXGPIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.68%

-16.72%

-31.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.27%

-1.69%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.46%

-4.14%

-9.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.14%

-16.72%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.68%

-16.72%

-31.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.74%

-0.53%

-3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.29%

-3.99%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

0.39%

+2.17%

Volatility

MDCEX vs. GPIFX - Volatility Comparison

Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy (MDCEX) has a higher volatility of 3.11% compared to GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX) at 0.63%. This indicates that MDCEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDCEXGPIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

0.63%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

2.13%

+8.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.71%

2.54%

+9.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.98%

4.80%

+9.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.42%

5.32%

+10.10%

MDCEX vs. GPIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDCEX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIFX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDCEX vs. GPIFX - Dividend Comparison

MDCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.39%, more than GPIFX's 4.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPIFX
GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund
4.90%5.15%5.18%4.86%1.96%3.10%2.62%3.73%3.46%3.90%1.97%1.24%
MDCEX
Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy
11.39%11.38%12.11%8.00%9.10%41.90%10.81%10.09%17.17%2.33%3.30%9.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDCEX and GPIFX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDCEX has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to GPIFX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDCEX dropped -48.68% vs GPIFX's -16.72%.

GPIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDCEX and GPIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer