MDCEX vs. COTZX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MDCEX (Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy) and COTZX (Columbia Thermostat Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, MDCEX returned 10.14%/yr vs 7.19%/yr for COTZX. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MDCEX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for COTZX.

Performance

MDCEX vs. COTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy (MDCEX) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDCEX achieves a 3.92% return, which is significantly higher than COTZX's 2.42% return. Over the past 10 years, MDCEX has outperformed COTZX with an annualized return of 10.14%, while COTZX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.19% annualized return.

MDCEX

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: -2.71%
• 6M: 0.35%
• YTD: 3.92%
• 1Y: 14.98%
• 3Y*: 18.04%
• 5Y*: 11.06%
• 10Y*: 10.14%
• ALL TIME*: 8.86%

COTZX

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: -0.60%
• 6M: 2.13%
• YTD: 2.42%
• 1Y: 7.46%
• 3Y*: 9.83%
• 5Y*: 4.24%
• 10Y*: 7.19%
• ALL TIME*: 7.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MDCEX Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MDCEX vs. COTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MDCEX Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy	3.92%	28.05%	14.98%	23.93%	-6.59%	12.61%	-6.12%	25.56%	-9.04%	20.71%
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund	2.42%	15.02%	7.98%	11.66%	-12.92%	6.44%	29.61%	15.15%	-1.17%	3.33%

Correlation

The correlation between MDCEX and COTZX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2012	0.63

The correlation between MDCEX and COTZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (5 years) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MDCEX vs. COTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MDCEX

MDCEX Risk / Return Rank: 37
MDCEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
MDCEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
MDCEX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
MDCEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
MDCEX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

COTZX

COTZX Risk / Return Rank: 55
COTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
COTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
COTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
COTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
COTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MDCEX vs. COTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy (MDCEX) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MDCEX	COTZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.35	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	1.97	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.25	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	1.82	-0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.39	8.08	-2.68

MDCEX vs. COTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDCEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the COTZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDCEX and COTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MDCEX vs. COTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDCEX drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, roughly equal to the maximum COTZX drawdown of -47.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDCEX and COTZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDCEX	COTZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.68%	-47.48%	-1.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.27%	-4.02%	-5.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.46%	-6.92%	-6.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.14%	-17.80%	-3.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.68%	-17.80%	-30.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.74%	-1.04%	-2.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.29%	-3.45%	-1.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	0.90%	+1.66%

Volatility

MDCEX vs. COTZX - Volatility Comparison

Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy (MDCEX) has a higher volatility of 3.11% compared to Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) at 1.57%. This indicates that MDCEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MDCEX	COTZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.11%	1.57%	+1.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.22%	4.51%	+5.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.71%	5.42%	+6.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.98%	7.42%	+6.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.42%	7.42%	+8.00%

MDCEX vs. COTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDCEX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than COTZX's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

MDCEX vs. COTZX - Dividend Comparison

MDCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.39%, more than COTZX's 3.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund	3.28%	3.37%	3.55%	2.74%	3.28%	14.82%	6.92%	5.57%	4.45%	3.13%	2.66%	4.26%
MDCEX Matisse Discounted Closed-End Fund Strategy	11.39%	11.38%	12.11%	8.00%	9.10%	41.90%	10.81%	10.09%	17.17%	2.33%	3.30%	9.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDCEX and COTZX in my portfolio?

MDCEX and COTZX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MDCEX or COTZX?

MDCEX has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to COTZX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDCEX dropped -48.68% vs COTZX's -47.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COTZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.