GPIFX vs. FLMFX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX) and Meeder Muirfield Fund (FLMFX).
GPIFX is managed by GuidePath. It was launched on Aug 30, 2012. FLMFX is managed by Meeder Funds. It was launched on Aug 9, 1988.
Performance
GPIFX vs. FLMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GPIFX vs. FLMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIFX GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund | -0.45% | 3.69% | 4.22% | 7.13% | -14.14% | 1.17% | 15.17% | 6.64% | -2.48% | 6.83% |
FLMFX Meeder Muirfield Fund | -4.00% | 15.28% | 36.53% | 13.79% | -11.16% | 20.18% | 4.36% | 13.52% | -3.65% | 20.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPIFX achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly higher than FLMFX's -4.00% return. Over the past 10 years, GPIFX has underperformed FLMFX with an annualized return of 2.64%, while FLMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.35% annualized return.
GPIFX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 2.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.78%
- 5Y*
- 0.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.64%
FLMFX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -8.40%
- YTD
- -4.00%
- 6M
- -1.15%
- 1Y
- 14.80%
- 3Y*
- 18.89%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- 10.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GPIFX vs. FLMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPIFX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FLMFX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GPIFX vs. FLMFX — Risk / Return Rank
GPIFX
FLMFX
GPIFX vs. FLMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX) and Meeder Muirfield Fund (FLMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPIFX | FLMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 1.02 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | 1.47 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.21 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 1.34 | -0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.88 | 5.44 | -3.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPIFX | FLMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 1.02 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.80 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.74 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.62 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between GPIFX and FLMFX is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GPIFX vs. FLMFX - Dividend Comparison
GPIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, less than FLMFX's 5.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIFX GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund | 4.69% | 5.15% | 5.18% | 4.86% | 1.96% | 3.10% | 2.62% | 3.73% | 3.46% | 3.90% | 1.97% | 1.24% |
FLMFX Meeder Muirfield Fund | 5.68% | 5.55% | 31.99% | 2.83% | 2.76% | 3.39% | 0.58% | 2.69% | 1.50% | 8.25% | 0.72% | 2.72% |
Drawdowns
GPIFX vs. FLMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPIFX drawdown since its inception was -16.72%, smaller than the maximum FLMFX drawdown of -42.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIFX and FLMFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPIFX | FLMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.72% | -42.42% | +25.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.50% | -9.78% | +6.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.72% | -18.19% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.72% | -24.33% | +7.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.79% | -9.26% | +6.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -9.30% | +5.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.24% | 2.41% | -1.17% |
Volatility
GPIFX vs. FLMFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX) is 1.29%, while Meeder Muirfield Fund (FLMFX) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that GPIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GPIFX | FLMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.29% | 4.65% | -3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.75% | 9.33% | -7.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73% | 15.04% | -12.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.78% | 14.51% | -9.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.31% | 14.01% | -8.70% |