PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
COTZX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between COTZX and FSKAX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

COTZX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.71%
10.72%
COTZX
FSKAX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

COTZX:

0.81

FSKAX:

2.03

Sortino Ratio

COTZX:

1.10

FSKAX:

2.71

Omega Ratio

COTZX:

1.15

FSKAX:

1.38

Calmar Ratio

COTZX:

0.33

FSKAX:

3.04

Martin Ratio

COTZX:

4.02

FSKAX:

12.79

Ulcer Index

COTZX:

1.36%

FSKAX:

2.05%

Daily Std Dev

COTZX:

6.77%

FSKAX:

12.89%

Max Drawdown

COTZX:

-49.51%

FSKAX:

-35.01%

Current Drawdown

COTZX:

-9.91%

FSKAX:

-2.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COTZX achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's 25.79% return. Over the past 10 years, COTZX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 2.88%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.27% annualized return.


COTZX

YTD

5.14%

1M

-3.26%

6M

1.71%

1Y

5.48%

5Y*

3.28%

10Y*

2.88%

FSKAX

YTD

25.79%

1M

-0.49%

6M

10.72%

1Y

26.16%

5Y*

14.12%

10Y*

12.27%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


COTZX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COTZX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


COTZX
Columbia Thermostat Fund
Expense ratio chart for COTZX: current value at 0.24% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.24%
Expense ratio chart for FSKAX: current value at 0.02% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.02%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

COTZX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COTZX, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.812.03
The chart of Sortino ratio for COTZX, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.102.71
The chart of Omega ratio for COTZX, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.151.38
The chart of Calmar ratio for COTZX, currently valued at 0.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.000.333.04
The chart of Martin ratio for COTZX, currently valued at 4.02, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.004.0212.79
COTZX
FSKAX

The current COTZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COTZX and FSKAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.81
2.03
COTZX
FSKAX

Dividends

COTZX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

COTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, more than FSKAX's 0.18% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
COTZX
Columbia Thermostat Fund
0.40%2.74%2.32%1.85%1.74%1.98%2.26%3.74%0.78%2.27%2.19%2.03%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.18%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.80%2.06%1.66%1.82%1.96%1.63%1.54%

Drawdowns

COTZX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COTZX drawdown since its inception was -49.51%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTZX and FSKAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-9.91%
-2.43%
COTZX
FSKAX

Volatility

COTZX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) is 3.29%, while Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that COTZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
3.29%
4.00%
COTZX
FSKAX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab