MDB vs. APH
MDB (MongoDB, Inc.) and APH (Amphenol Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — MDB in Software - Infrastructure, APH in Electronic Components. Over the past 5 years, MDB returned 0.52%/yr vs 36.37%/yr for APH. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MDB vs. APH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDB achieves a -18.32% return, which is significantly lower than APH's 14.03% return.
MDB
- 1D
- -3.28%
- 1M
- 9.82%
- YTD
- -18.32%
- 6M
- -18.19%
- 1Y
- 66.71%
- 3Y*
- -3.72%
- 5Y*
- 0.52%
- 10Y*
- —
APH
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 23.04%
- YTD
- 14.03%
- 6M
- 19.47%
- 1Y
- 67.47%
- 3Y*
- 57.45%
- 5Y*
- 36.37%
- 10Y*
- 27.74%
MDB vs. APH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDB MongoDB, Inc. | -18.32% | 80.27% | -43.06% | 107.71% | -62.81% | 47.43% | 172.81% | 57.17% | 182.14% | -10.06% |
APH Amphenol Corporation | 14.03% | 96.08% | 41.30% | 31.85% | -11.96% | 35.25% | 22.09% | 34.91% | -6.82% | 1.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDB and APH is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017 | 0.33 |
The correlation between MDB and APH shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MDB:
$27.97B
APH:
$198.36B
MDB:
-$0.35
APH:
$4.58
MDB:
10.88
APH:
7.62
MDB:
9.53
APH:
14.19
MDB:
$2.60B
APH:
$25.90B
MDB:
$1.87B
APH:
$9.67B
MDB:
-$19.89M
APH:
$7.45B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDB vs. APH — Risk / Return Rank
MDB
APH
MDB vs. APH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDB | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.28 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 2.27 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.96 | 5.85 | -2.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDB vs. APH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDB drawdown since its inception was -76.52%, which is greater than APH's maximum drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDB and APH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDB | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.52% | -63.41% | -13.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.72% | -28.19% | -20.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.88% | -28.19% | -42.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.52% | -28.73% | -47.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.40% | -7.31% | -34.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.85% | -13.56% | -17.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.29% | 10.92% | +10.37% |
Volatility
MDB vs. APH - Volatility Comparison
MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) has a higher volatility of 27.80% compared to Amphenol Corporation (APH) at 15.50%. This indicates that MDB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDB | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.80% | 15.50% | +12.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.20% | 37.39% | +14.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.95% | 41.68% | +31.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.24% | 30.75% | +39.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.97% | 27.93% | +38.04% |
Dividends
MDB vs. APH - Dividend Comparison
MDB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.54% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 1.07% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% |
MDB MongoDB, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MDB vs. APH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MongoDB, Inc. and Amphenol Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MDB vs. APH - Profitability Comparison
MDB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MongoDB, Inc. reported a gross profit of 496.18M and revenue of 687.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.2%.
APH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 7.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
MDB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MongoDB, Inc. reported an operating income of -24.80M and revenue of 687.62M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.6%.
APH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 1.83B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.
MDB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MongoDB, Inc. reported a net income of 4.43M and revenue of 687.62M, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.
APH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 2.35B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MDB and APH have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDB has higher volatility (27.80%) compared to APH (15.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDB dropped -76.52% vs APH's -63.41%.
APH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDB and APH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer