PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDAA vs. LCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDAA vs. LCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA) and LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MDAA

1D
1.17%
1M
-1.05%
6M
6.38%
YTD
14.47%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

LCO

1D
-0.44%
1M
-2.48%
6M
-3.22%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$390.19$330.48$1.34K
$2.14K$4.90K$43.45K

MDAA vs. LCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MDAA and LCO is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026

0.83

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDAA vs. LCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA) and LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MDAA vs. LCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDAA vs. LCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDAA drawdown since its inception was -14.59%, roughly equal to the maximum LCO drawdown of -14.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDAA and LCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDAALCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.59%

-14.32%

-0.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.31%

-11.22%

+3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-5.46%

+1.94%

Volatility

MDAA vs. LCO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDAALCODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.54%

25.67%

-1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.54%

25.67%

-1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.54%

25.67%

-1.13%

MDAA vs. LCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDAA has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than LCO's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDAA vs. LCO - Dividend Comparison

MDAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, while LCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


MDAA and LCO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MDAA is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MDAA is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for LCO.

MDAA has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.00% for LCO.

They also come from different issuers: Myriad and LOGIQ. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MDAA and 1.13% for LCO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDAA and LCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer