PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCYVX vs. MMHVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCYVX vs. MMHVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MCYVX) and MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCYVX achieves a 31.16% return, which is significantly higher than MMHVX's 3.05% return.


MCYVX

1D
-4.00%
1M
3.23%
YTD
31.16%
6M
32.26%
1Y
59.21%
3Y*
26.69%
5Y*
6.26%
10Y*

MMHVX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.23%
YTD
3.05%
6M
3.60%
1Y
8.91%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
1.08%
10Y*
3.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCYVX vs. MMHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MCYVX
MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Equity Fund
31.16%34.98%11.91%6.92%-28.37%-4.28%35.91%21.56%-26.04%
MMHVX
MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
3.05%4.27%4.24%8.60%-14.42%6.12%5.18%9.18%4.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MCYVX and MMHVX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2018

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCYVX vs. MMHVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCYVX
MCYVX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MCYVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCYVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCYVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MCYVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCYVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

MMHVX
MMHVX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
MMHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MMHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCYVX vs. MMHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MCYVX) and MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MCYVXMMHVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.60

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.24

2.86

+2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.09

10.04

+8.05

MCYVX vs. MMHVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCYVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is comparable to the MMHVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCYVX and MMHVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCYVX vs. MMHVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCYVX drawdown since its inception was -44.62%, which is greater than MMHVX's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCYVX and MMHVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCYVXMMHVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.62%

-20.86%

-23.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-3.11%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.79%

-8.16%

-9.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.04%

-20.86%

-20.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.00%

-0.08%

-3.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.73%

-3.19%

-17.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

0.88%

+2.62%

Volatility

MCYVX vs. MMHVX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MCYVX) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) at 0.98%. This indicates that MCYVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCYVXMMHVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.00%

0.98%

+9.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.41%

2.57%

+15.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.99%

3.56%

+17.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.40%

5.66%

+11.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.96%

5.33%

+13.63%

MCYVX vs. MMHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCYVX has a 1.57% expense ratio, which is higher than MMHVX's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCYVX vs. MMHVX - Dividend Comparison

MCYVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than MMHVX's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCYVX
MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Equity Fund
4.02%5.27%0.14%0.62%0.63%0.45%0.19%1.74%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MMHVX
MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
3.96%5.31%3.98%3.28%3.47%2.71%3.32%3.83%3.91%3.92%4.20%4.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCYVX and MMHVX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCYVX has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to MMHVX (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCYVX dropped -44.62% vs MMHVX's -20.86%.

MCYVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCYVX and MMHVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer