PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCYVX vs. BEMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCYVX vs. BEMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MCYVX) and Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCYVX achieves a 32.67% return, which is significantly higher than BEMIX's 24.82% return.


MCYVX

1D
1.28%
1M
7.91%
YTD
32.67%
6M
36.14%
1Y
69.67%
3Y*
27.70%
5Y*
6.38%
10Y*

BEMIX

1D
2.15%
1M
7.58%
YTD
24.82%
6M
26.44%
1Y
60.03%
3Y*
28.32%
5Y*
12.70%
10Y*
10.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCYVX vs. BEMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MCYVX
MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Equity Fund
32.67%34.98%11.91%6.92%-28.37%-4.28%35.91%21.56%-26.04%
BEMIX
Brandes Emerging Markets Fund
24.82%47.83%4.01%22.53%-15.91%1.68%-6.17%18.60%-17.10%

Correlation

The correlation between MCYVX and BEMIX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2018

0.75

The correlation between MCYVX and BEMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCYVX vs. BEMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCYVX
MCYVX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
MCYVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCYVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCYVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MCYVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCYVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

BEMIX
BEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCYVX vs. BEMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MCYVX) and Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCYVXBEMIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.77

3.69

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.44

4.63

-0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.72

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.77

4.95

+0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.84

20.69

+0.16

MCYVX vs. BEMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCYVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.77, which is comparable to the BEMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCYVX and BEMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCYVXBEMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77

3.69

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.77

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.31

+0.09

Drawdowns

MCYVX vs. BEMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCYVX drawdown since its inception was -44.62%, roughly equal to the maximum BEMIX drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCYVX and BEMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCYVXBEMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.62%

-46.05%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-12.07%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.79%

-16.08%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.04%

-36.37%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.87%

-14.18%

-6.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

2.89%

+0.47%

Volatility

MCYVX vs. BEMIX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MCYVX) and Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) have volatilities of 6.79% and 6.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCYVXBEMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.79%

6.65%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.10%

14.20%

+1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.03%

16.69%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

16.55%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.76%

17.10%

+1.66%

MCYVX vs. BEMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCYVX has a 1.57% expense ratio, which is higher than BEMIX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCYVX vs. BEMIX - Dividend Comparison

MCYVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than BEMIX's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BEMIX
Brandes Emerging Markets Fund
1.72%2.15%3.04%2.45%2.86%2.31%1.31%2.56%1.55%1.41%2.20%1.54%
MCYVX
MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Equity Fund
3.97%5.27%0.14%0.62%0.63%0.45%0.19%1.74%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCYVX and BEMIX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCYVX has higher volatility (6.79%) compared to BEMIX (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCYVX dropped -44.62% vs BEMIX's -46.05%.

MCYVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.77 vs 3.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCYVX and BEMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer