PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMHVX vs. MDHVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMHVX vs. MDHVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) and MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMHVX achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly higher than MDHVX's 1.75% return. Over the past 10 years, MMHVX has underperformed MDHVX with an annualized return of 3.22%, while MDHVX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.63% annualized return.


MMHVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.94%
YTD
2.62%
6M
2.98%
1Y
8.94%
3Y*
5.32%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*
3.22%

MDHVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
1.75%
6M
1.64%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
6.53%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*
4.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMHVX vs. MDHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMHVX
MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
2.62%4.27%4.24%8.60%-14.42%6.12%5.18%9.18%4.06%8.60%
MDHVX
MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund
1.75%5.38%6.51%9.86%-2.81%4.38%2.92%9.00%-0.13%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between MMHVX and MDHVX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2012

0.16

The correlation between MMHVX and MDHVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMHVX vs. MDHVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMHVX
MMHVX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MMHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MMHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

MDHVX
MDHVX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
MDHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MDHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMHVX vs. MDHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) and MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMHVXMDHVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.40

2.95

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.90

4.42

-0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.78

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

5.14

-2.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.90

25.73

-15.83

MMHVX vs. MDHVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMHVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the MDHVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMHVX and MDHVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMHVXMDHVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.95

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

1.67

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

1.36

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

1.37

-0.32

Drawdowns

MMHVX vs. MDHVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMHVX drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, which is greater than MDHVX's maximum drawdown of -18.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMHVX and MDHVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMHVXMDHVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.86%

-18.04%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-1.06%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.16%

-2.65%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.86%

-6.26%

-14.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.86%

-18.04%

-2.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-0.78%

-2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.21%

+0.67%

Volatility

MMHVX vs. MDHVX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX) at 0.48%. This indicates that MMHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMHVXMDHVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

0.48%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.59%

1.42%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.61%

1.80%

+1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.66%

2.58%

+3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.33%

3.43%

+1.90%

MMHVX vs. MDHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMHVX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than MDHVX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMHVX vs. MDHVX - Dividend Comparison

MMHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, less than MDHVX's 5.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDHVX
MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund
5.33%5.47%6.01%5.53%4.31%3.80%4.44%4.37%4.33%4.03%4.95%4.87%
MMHVX
MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
3.98%5.31%3.98%3.28%3.47%2.71%3.32%3.83%3.91%3.92%4.20%4.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMHVX and MDHVX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMHVX has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to MDHVX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMHVX dropped -20.86% vs MDHVX's -18.04%.

MDHVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMHVX and MDHVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer