PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMHVX vs. MNOVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMHVX vs. MNOVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) and MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MNOVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMHVX achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly higher than MNOVX's 2.32% return. Over the past 10 years, MMHVX has outperformed MNOVX with an annualized return of 3.22%, while MNOVX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.22% annualized return.


MMHVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.94%
YTD
2.62%
6M
2.98%
1Y
8.94%
3Y*
5.32%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*
3.22%

MNOVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.74%
YTD
2.32%
6M
2.65%
1Y
8.72%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
0.67%
10Y*
2.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMHVX vs. MNOVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMHVX
MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
2.62%4.27%4.24%8.60%-14.42%6.12%5.18%9.18%4.06%8.60%
MNOVX
MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund
2.32%4.39%2.21%6.55%-12.42%3.68%5.10%7.59%1.92%5.64%

Correlation

The correlation between MMHVX and MNOVX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2012

0.86

The correlation between MMHVX and MNOVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMHVX vs. MNOVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMHVX
MMHVX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MMHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MMHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

MNOVX
MNOVX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MNOVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNOVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNOVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MNOVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNOVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMHVX vs. MNOVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) and MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MNOVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMHVXMNOVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.40

2.50

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.90

4.07

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.63

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.83

-0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.90

10.20

-0.30

MMHVX vs. MNOVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMHVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the MNOVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMHVX and MNOVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMHVXMNOVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.50

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.14

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.47

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.69

+0.37

Drawdowns

MMHVX vs. MNOVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMHVX drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, which is greater than MNOVX's maximum drawdown of -18.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMHVX and MNOVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMHVXMNOVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.86%

-18.57%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-2.99%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.16%

-7.07%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.86%

-18.57%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.86%

-18.57%

-2.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-3.40%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.83%

+0.05%

Volatility

MMHVX vs. MNOVX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MNOVX) at 1.27%. This indicates that MMHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNOVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMHVXMNOVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

1.27%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.59%

2.46%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.61%

3.38%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.66%

4.93%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.33%

4.79%

+0.54%

MMHVX vs. MNOVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMHVX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than MNOVX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMHVX vs. MNOVX - Dividend Comparison

MMHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than MNOVX's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMHVX
MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
3.98%5.31%3.98%3.28%3.47%2.71%3.32%3.83%3.91%3.92%4.20%4.40%
MNOVX
MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund
3.72%4.85%3.65%2.92%2.92%2.24%2.68%3.17%3.35%3.42%3.47%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MMHVX and MNOVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MMHVX has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to MNOVX (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMHVX dropped -20.86% vs MNOVX's -18.57%.

MNOVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMHVX and MNOVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer