MMHVX vs. MNOVX
Compare and contrast key facts about MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) and MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MNOVX).
MMHVX is managed by MainStay. It was launched on Mar 30, 2010. MNOVX is managed by MainStay. It was launched on May 13, 2012.
Performance
MMHVX vs. MNOVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MMHVX vs. MNOVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMHVX MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | -0.22% | 4.27% | 4.24% | 8.60% | -14.42% | 6.12% | 5.18% | 9.18% | 4.06% | 8.60% |
MNOVX MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund | -0.23% | 4.39% | 2.21% | 6.55% | -12.42% | 3.68% | 5.10% | 7.59% | 1.92% | 5.64% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MMHVX having a -0.22% return and MNOVX slightly lower at -0.23%. Over the past 10 years, MMHVX has outperformed MNOVX with an annualized return of 3.18%, while MNOVX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.16% annualized return.
MMHVX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 3.27%
- 3Y*
- 4.58%
- 5Y*
- 1.01%
- 10Y*
- 3.18%
MNOVX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 3.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.60%
- 10Y*
- 2.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MMHVX vs. MNOVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMHVX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than MNOVX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MMHVX vs. MNOVX — Risk / Return Rank
MMHVX
MNOVX
MMHVX vs. MNOVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) and MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MNOVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMHVX | MNOVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.57 | 0.73 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.80 | 1.01 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.20 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 0.99 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.20 | 2.80 | -0.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMHVX | MNOVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 0.73 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.12 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.45 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 0.65 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between MMHVX and MNOVX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MMHVX vs. MNOVX - Dividend Comparison
MMHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than MNOVX's 3.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMHVX MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 4.04% | 5.31% | 3.98% | 3.28% | 3.47% | 2.71% | 3.32% | 3.83% | 3.91% | 3.92% | 4.20% | 4.40% |
MNOVX MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund | 3.72% | 4.85% | 3.65% | 2.92% | 2.92% | 2.24% | 2.68% | 3.17% | 3.35% | 3.42% | 3.47% | 3.53% |
Drawdowns
MMHVX vs. MNOVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMHVX drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, which is greater than MNOVX's maximum drawdown of -18.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMHVX and MNOVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMHVX | MNOVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.86% | -18.57% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.27% | -5.54% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.86% | -18.57% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.86% | -18.57% | -2.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -2.47% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -3.43% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 1.95% | +0.30% |
Volatility
MMHVX vs. MNOVX - Volatility Comparison
MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MNOVX) at 1.30%. This indicates that MMHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNOVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MMHVX | MNOVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.39% | 1.30% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.13% | 2.02% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.65% | 5.85% | +0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.61% | 4.88% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.30% | 4.77% | +0.53% |