PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCSE vs. IFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCSE vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCSE achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 16.93% return.


MCSE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.12%
6M
0.51%
1Y
1.44%
3Y*
0.69%
5Y*
10Y*

IFLO

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
16.93%
6M
16.46%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCSE vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MCSE and IFLO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.48

MCSE vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MCSE
IFLO

Technology

31.1%
21.5%

Healthcare

20.1%
11.7%

Industrials

18.1%
18.1%

Consumer Cyclical

13.8%
13.8%

Basic Materials

5.1%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
2.8%

Communication Services

4.7%
6.7%

Financial Services

2.1%
1.1%

Energy

-

12.1%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

1.0%

Technology

MCSE
31.1%
IFLO
21.5%

Healthcare

MCSE
20.1%
IFLO
11.7%

Industrials

MCSE
18.1%
IFLO
18.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MCSE
13.8%
IFLO
13.8%

Basic Materials

MCSE
5.1%
IFLO
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

MCSE
5.0%
IFLO
2.8%

Communication Services

MCSE
4.7%
IFLO
6.7%

Financial Services

MCSE
2.1%
IFLO
1.1%

Energy

MCSE

-

IFLO
12.1%

Real Estate

MCSE

-

IFLO
0.0%

Utilities

MCSE

-

IFLO
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCSE vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCSE
MCSE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MCSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCSE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MCSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCSE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

IFLO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCSE vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MCSEIFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.36

MCSE vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCSE vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCSE drawdown since its inception was -26.36%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSE and IFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCSEIFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.36%

-6.44%

-19.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-6.44%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.51%

-3.37%

-7.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.75%

-1.25%

-7.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

Volatility

MCSE vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCSEIFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.49%

14.75%

-3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.35%

14.75%

+4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.35%

14.75%

+4.60%

MCSE vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCSE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCSE vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

MCSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than IFLO's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IFLO
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF
1.51%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MCSE
Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF
3.74%3.78%0.63%0.57%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCSE and IFLO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 32.28% vs 1.44% for MCSE. On fees, IFLO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 32.28% return vs 1.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFLO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MCSE.

MCSE has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 1.51% for IFLO.

They also come from different issuers: Martin Currie and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MCSE and 0.56% for IFLO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCSE and IFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer