MCSE vs. IFLO
MCSE (Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, MCSE returned 1.44% vs 32.28% for IFLO. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MCSE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.
Performance
MCSE vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCSE achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 16.93% return.
MCSE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- 1.44%
- 3Y*
- 0.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFLO
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 6M
- 16.46%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MCSE vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MCSE Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF | 1.12% | 0.32% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 16.93% | 13.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCSE and IFLO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.48 |
MCSE vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MCSE
IFLO
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Financial Services
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MCSE
IFLO
Healthcare
MCSE
IFLO
Industrials
MCSE
IFLO
Consumer Cyclical
MCSE
IFLO
Basic Materials
MCSE
IFLO
Consumer Defensive
MCSE
IFLO
Communication Services
MCSE
IFLO
Financial Services
MCSE
IFLO
Energy
MCSE
-
IFLO
Real Estate
MCSE
-
IFLO
Utilities
MCSE
-
IFLO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCSE vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank
MCSE
IFLO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MCSE vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCSE | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.36 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCSE vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCSE drawdown since its inception was -26.36%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSE and IFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCSE | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.36% | -6.44% | -19.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -6.44% | -3.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.51% | -3.37% | -7.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.75% | -1.25% | -7.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | — | — |
Volatility
MCSE vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCSE | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.49% | 14.75% | -3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 14.75% | +4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 14.75% | +4.60% |
MCSE vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCSE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
MCSE vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison
MCSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than IFLO's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.51% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MCSE Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF | 3.74% | 3.78% | 0.63% | 0.57% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCSE and IFLO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 32.28% vs 1.44% for MCSE. On fees, IFLO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 32.28% return vs 1.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFLO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MCSE.
MCSE has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 1.51% for IFLO.
They also come from different issuers: Martin Currie and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MCSE and 0.56% for IFLO.
Find the right allocation for MCSE and IFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer