MCONX vs. MBAPX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MCONX (Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio) and MBAPX (Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Praxis Mutual Funds. Over the past 10 years, MCONX returned 4.33%/yr vs 7.89%/yr for MBAPX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MCONX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MBAPX.

Performance

MCONX vs. MBAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio (MCONX) and Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio (MBAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCONX achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly lower than MBAPX's 8.49% return. Over the past 10 years, MCONX has underperformed MBAPX with an annualized return of 4.33%, while MBAPX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.89% annualized return.

MCONX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.98%
• YTD: 3.22%
• 6M: 3.11%
• 1Y: 9.88%
• 3Y*: 7.76%
• 5Y*: 2.10%
• 10Y*: 4.33%

MBAPX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 8.49%
• 6M: 8.07%
• 1Y: 18.32%
• 3Y*: 12.78%
• 5Y*: 5.27%
• 10Y*: 7.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCONX vs. MBAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MCONX Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio	3.22%	10.15%	5.16%	9.51%	-14.59%	1.66%	10.28%	13.67%	-2.64%	8.36%
MBAPX Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio	8.49%	13.46%	9.04%	14.02%	-16.06%	8.09%	12.98%	19.90%	-4.91%	13.38%

Correlation

The correlation between MCONX and MBAPX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2009	0.90

The correlation between MCONX and MBAPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MCONX vs. MBAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCONX

MCONX Risk / Return Rank: 49
MCONX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
MCONX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
MCONX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
MCONX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
MCONX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

MBAPX

MBAPX Risk / Return Rank: 68
MBAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
MBAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
MBAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MBAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
MBAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCONX vs. MBAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio (MCONX) and Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio (MBAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MCONX	MBAPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	2.21	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	3.15	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.42	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	2.97	-0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.36	12.67	-3.31

MCONX vs. MBAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCONX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the MBAPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCONX and MBAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MCONX vs. MBAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCONX drawdown since its inception was -21.51%, smaller than the maximum MBAPX drawdown of -24.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCONX and MBAPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCONX	MBAPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.51%	-24.54%	+3.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.45%	-6.41%	+1.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.12%	-10.32%	+3.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.51%	-24.54%	+3.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.51%	-24.54%	+3.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.17%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.97%	-3.70%	+0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	1.50%	-0.40%

Volatility

MCONX vs. MBAPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio (MCONX) is 2.11%, while Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio (MBAPX) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that MCONX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MBAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCONX	MBAPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.11%	3.54%	-1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.40%	7.16%	-2.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.34%	8.65%	-3.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.91%	10.43%	-3.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.22%	10.66%	-4.44%

MCONX vs. MBAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCONX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than MBAPX's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

MCONX vs. MBAPX - Dividend Comparison

MCONX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than MBAPX's 4.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MBAPX Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio	4.60%	4.93%	4.30%	2.23%	2.82%	2.12%	4.82%	3.80%	5.32%	3.76%	2.99%	3.38%
MCONX Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio	4.72%	4.76%	4.90%	1.85%	2.31%	1.66%	3.49%	2.61%	3.84%	3.06%	2.25%	2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCONX and MBAPX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, MCONX and MBAPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MCONX or MBAPX?

MBAPX has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to MCONX (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCONX dropped -21.51% vs MBAPX's -24.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MBAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.