MCMVX vs. HWMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Monongahela All Cap Value Fund (MCMVX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX).
MCMVX is managed by Moncapfund. It was launched on Jul 1, 2013. HWMIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997.
Performance
MCMVX vs. HWMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MCMVX vs. HWMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCMVX Monongahela All Cap Value Fund | 4.04% | 9.74% | 15.38% | 12.18% | -7.73% | 22.57% | 13.24% | 26.98% | -8.15% | 20.85% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 6.74% | 7.87% | 3.62% | 19.87% | 1.63% | 39.18% | 0.49% | 12.97% | -19.32% | 7.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCMVX achieves a 4.04% return, which is significantly lower than HWMIX's 6.74% return. Over the past 10 years, MCMVX has outperformed HWMIX with an annualized return of 11.92%, while HWMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.08% annualized return.
MCMVX
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- -6.19%
- YTD
- 4.04%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 20.02%
- 3Y*
- 13.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.92%
HWMIX
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCMVX vs. HWMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCMVX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than HWMIX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MCMVX vs. HWMIX — Risk / Return Rank
MCMVX
HWMIX
MCMVX vs. HWMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monongahela All Cap Value Fund (MCMVX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCMVX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 0.93 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 1.41 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.21 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 1.35 | +0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.61 | 5.49 | +1.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCMVX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 0.93 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.44 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.36 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.47 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between MCMVX and HWMIX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MCMVX vs. HWMIX - Dividend Comparison
MCMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than HWMIX's 1.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCMVX Monongahela All Cap Value Fund | 6.26% | 6.51% | 5.41% | 3.23% | 4.79% | 7.61% | 1.25% | 3.09% | 6.87% | 10.44% | 2.13% | 1.75% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.31% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.28% | 0.49% | 1.28% | 2.25% | 1.60% | 2.99% | 6.72% | 1.53% | 14.67% |
Drawdowns
MCMVX vs. HWMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCMVX drawdown since its inception was -36.75%, smaller than the maximum HWMIX drawdown of -69.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCMVX and HWMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCMVX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.75% | -69.84% | +33.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.77% | -16.87% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.06% | -25.90% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.75% | -63.21% | +26.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.19% | -3.32% | -2.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -10.89% | +6.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 4.15% | -1.01% |
Volatility
MCMVX vs. HWMIX - Volatility Comparison
Monongahela All Cap Value Fund (MCMVX) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) at 4.30%. This indicates that MCMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MCMVX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 4.30% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.31% | 12.42% | -2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.26% | 23.86% | -4.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 22.34% | -5.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 25.62% | -7.62% |