MCMVX vs. FRNKX
MCMVX (Monongahela All Cap Value Fund) and FRNKX (Frank Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MCMVX returned 12.66%/yr vs 8.21%/yr for FRNKX. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MCMVX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for FRNKX.
Performance
MCMVX vs. FRNKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCMVX achieves a 17.96% return, which is significantly higher than FRNKX's 17.03% return. Over the past 10 years, MCMVX has outperformed FRNKX with an annualized return of 12.66%, while FRNKX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.21% annualized return.
MCMVX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- YTD
- 17.96%
- 1Y
- 26.41%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.59%
FRNKX
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 14.31%
- YTD
- 17.03%
- 1Y
- 18.57%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FRNKX Frank Value Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MCMVX vs. FRNKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCMVX Monongahela All Cap Value Fund | 17.96% | 9.74% | 15.38% | 12.18% | -7.73% | 22.57% | 13.24% | 26.98% | -8.15% | 20.85% |
FRNKX Frank Value Fund | 17.03% | 12.05% | 19.31% | 14.88% | 4.23% | 6.46% | 12.84% | 4.15% | -2.24% | -2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCMVX and FRNKX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2013 | 0.67 |
The correlation between MCMVX and FRNKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCMVX vs. FRNKX — Risk / Return Rank
MCMVX
FRNKX
MCMVX vs. FRNKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monongahela All Cap Value Fund (MCMVX) and Frank Value Fund (FRNKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCMVX | FRNKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.21 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 2.54 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.14 | 6.52 | +3.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCMVX vs. FRNKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCMVX drawdown since its inception was -36.75%, smaller than the maximum FRNKX drawdown of -97.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCMVX and FRNKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCMVX | FRNKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.75% | -97.09% | +60.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.56% | -6.95% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.06% | -97.09% | +76.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.06% | -97.09% | +76.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.75% | -97.09% | +60.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.38% | -95.61% | +93.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.05% | -12.62% | +8.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 2.70% | -0.30% |
Volatility
MCMVX vs. FRNKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Monongahela All Cap Value Fund (MCMVX) is 3.14%, while Frank Value Fund (FRNKX) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that MCMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRNKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCMVX | FRNKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 3.56% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.98% | 10.97% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.59% | 15.02% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 1,805.77% | -1,789.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 1,276.35% | -1,258.36% |
MCMVX vs. FRNKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCMVX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FRNKX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
MCMVX vs. FRNKX - Dividend Comparison
MCMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, less than FRNKX's 10.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRNKX Frank Value Fund | 10.23% | 11.98% | 4.63% | 10.14% | 8.10% | 4.93% | 0.00% | 0.23% | 3.23% | 0.00% | 3.00% | 7.64% |
MCMVX Monongahela All Cap Value Fund | 5.52% | 6.51% | 5.41% | 3.23% | 4.79% | 7.61% | 1.25% | 3.09% | 6.87% | 10.44% | 2.13% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCMVX and FRNKX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRNKX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to MCMVX (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCMVX dropped -36.75% vs FRNKX's -97.09%.
MCMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCMVX and FRNKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer