MCHT.L vs. ECAR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MCHT.L (Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF) and ECAR.L (iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from Invesco and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MCHT.L returned 13.22%/yr vs 27.13%/yr for ECAR.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MCHT.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ECAR.L.

Performance

MCHT.L vs. ECAR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF (MCHT.L) and iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCHT.L achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly lower than ECAR.L's 57.85% return.

MCHT.L

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 2.16%
• YTD: 2.81%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 18.14%
• 3Y*: 13.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ECAR.L

• 1D: -1.93%
• 1M: 20.58%
• YTD: 57.85%
• 6M: 59.03%
• 1Y: 91.94%
• 3Y*: 27.13%
• 5Y*: 12.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCHT.L vs. ECAR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MCHT.L Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF	2.81%	31.75%	21.18%	-18.06%	-31.36%	-19.40%
ECAR.L iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	57.85%	24.33%	-0.93%	27.09%	-27.28%	1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MCHT.L and ECAR.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021	0.36

Over the past year, MCHT.L and ECAR.L have become more correlated (0.61) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.

MCHT.L vs. ECAR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MCHT.L	ECAR.L
Technology	30.3%	66.1%
Consumer Cyclical	24.0%	28.6%
Communication Services	15.7%	-
Industrials	14.3%	4.8%
Basic Materials	6.6%	0.2%
Utilities	4.3%	-
Healthcare	2.4%	-
Financial Services	1.6%	-
Real Estate	0.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	-
Energy	-	-

Return for Risk

MCHT.L vs. ECAR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCHT.L

MCHT.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
MCHT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
MCHT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
MCHT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
MCHT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
MCHT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 18

ECAR.L

ECAR.L Risk / Return Rank: 92
ECAR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ECAR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ECAR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ECAR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ECAR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCHT.L vs. ECAR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF (MCHT.L) and iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MCHT.L	ECAR.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	3.53	-2.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	4.60	-3.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.55	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	7.02	-6.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.79	21.74	-19.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MCHT.L vs. ECAR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCHT.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the ECAR.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCHT.L and ECAR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MCHT.L	ECAR.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76	3.53	-2.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.21	0.62	-0.83

Drawdowns

MCHT.L vs. ECAR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCHT.L drawdown since its inception was -62.63%, which is greater than ECAR.L's maximum drawdown of -42.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHT.L and ECAR.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCHT.L	ECAR.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.63%	-42.77%	-19.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.55%	-13.03%	-7.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.84%	-29.34%	-4.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.53%	-1.93%	-26.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.11%	-11.56%	-27.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.08%	4.21%	+5.87%

Volatility

MCHT.L vs. ECAR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF (MCHT.L) is 9.51%, while iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) has a volatility of 12.68%. This indicates that MCHT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECAR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCHT.L	ECAR.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.51%	12.68%	-3.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.64%	21.36%	-4.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.69%	25.91%	-2.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.35%	24.72%	+18.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.35%	25.69%	+17.66%

MCHT.L vs. ECAR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCHT.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ECAR.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

MCHT.L vs. ECAR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MCHT.L nor ECAR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCHT.L and ECAR.L in my portfolio?

MCHT.L and ECAR.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MCHT.L or ECAR.L?

On fees, ECAR.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MCHT.L or ECAR.L?

ECAR.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MCHT.L.

What is the main difference between MCHT.L and ECAR.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MCHT.L and 0.40% for ECAR.L.