ECAR.L vs. LIT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT).
ECAR.L and LIT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ECAR.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Feb 20, 2019. LIT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Lithium Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010. Both ECAR.L and LIT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ECAR.L or LIT.
Correlation
The correlation between ECAR.L and LIT is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ECAR.L vs. LIT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ECAR.L:
0.12
LIT:
0.13
ECAR.L:
0.31
LIT:
0.44
ECAR.L:
1.04
LIT:
1.05
ECAR.L:
0.12
LIT:
0.07
ECAR.L:
0.31
LIT:
0.32
ECAR.L:
8.24%
LIT:
13.06%
ECAR.L:
21.23%
LIT:
32.08%
ECAR.L:
-42.77%
LIT:
-62.61%
ECAR.L:
-10.66%
LIT:
-54.64%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECAR.L achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's 3.83% return.
ECAR.L
2.16%
2.32%
4.56%
3.07%
8.21%
N/A
LIT
3.83%
1.12%
16.74%
0.82%
6.48%
7.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ECAR.L vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECAR.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ECAR.L vs. LIT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ECAR.L
LIT
ECAR.L vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ECAR.L vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison
ECAR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECAR.L iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 0.90% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
ECAR.L vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECAR.L drawdown since its inception was -42.77%, smaller than the maximum LIT drawdown of -62.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECAR.L and LIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ECAR.L vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 6.33%. This indicates that ECAR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.