MCHI vs. YANG
MCHI (iShares MSCI China ETF) and YANG (Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares) are both China Equities funds - MCHI tracks the MSCI China Index while YANG tracks the FTSE China 50 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MCHI returned 3.91%/yr vs -36.87%/yr for YANG. At a correlation of -0.94, they often move in opposite directions. MCHI charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for YANG.
Performance
MCHI vs. YANG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCHI achieves a -9.26% return, which is significantly lower than YANG's 28.25% return. Over the past 10 years, MCHI has outperformed YANG with an annualized return of 3.91%, while YANG has yielded a comparatively lower -36.87% annualized return.
MCHI
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- 6M
- -14.23%
- YTD
- -9.26%
- 1Y
- -2.65%
- 3Y*
- 7.81%
- 5Y*
- -5.11%
- 10Y*
- 3.91%
YANG
- 1D
- -4.53%
- 1M
- 6.57%
- 6M
- 48.72%
- YTD
- 28.25%
- 1Y
- 14.90%
- 3Y*
- -42.93%
- 5Y*
- -34.14%
- 10Y*
- -36.87%
MCHI vs. YANG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | -9.26% | 31.04% | 17.73% | -11.94% | -23.01% | -21.74% | 27.78% | 23.72% | -19.79% | 54.67% |
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares | 28.25% | -62.77% | -71.41% | 11.95% | -41.34% | 25.90% | -58.66% | -40.72% | 13.14% | -64.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCHI and YANG is -0.96, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | -0.94 |
The correlation between MCHI and YANG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCHI vs. YANG — Risk / Return Rank
MCHI
YANG
MCHI vs. YANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCHI | YANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.09 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 0.47 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 0.83 | -1.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCHI vs. YANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCHI drawdown since its inception was -62.95%, smaller than the maximum YANG drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHI and YANG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCHI | YANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.95% | -99.98% | +37.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.22% | -31.88% | +8.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.85% | -94.02% | +68.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.95% | -97.38% | +43.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.95% | -99.38% | +36.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.12% | -99.97% | +61.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.63% | -90.56% | +65.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.60% | 18.07% | -7.47% |
Volatility
MCHI vs. YANG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) is 5.84%, while Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG) has a volatility of 18.88%. This indicates that MCHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCHI | YANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 18.88% | -13.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.52% | 42.30% | -27.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.51% | 59.58% | -39.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.71% | 94.43% | -63.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.34% | 81.87% | -54.53% |
MCHI vs. YANG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCHI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than YANG's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
MCHI vs. YANG - Dividend Comparison
MCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than YANG's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 2.02% | 2.12% | 2.31% | 2.66% | 1.78% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 2.76% |
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares | 2.87% | 4.03% | 9.42% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 1.54% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCHI and YANG have a correlation of -0.96, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YANG has higher volatility (18.88%) compared to MCHI (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCHI dropped -62.95% vs YANG's -99.98%.
On 10-year performance, MCHI leads with 3.91% vs -36.87% for YANG. On fees, MCHI is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MCHI has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MCHI has performed better with a 3.91% return vs -36.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MCHI is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for YANG.
YANG has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 2.02% for MCHI.
MCHI tracks MSCI China Index, while YANG tracks FTSE China 50 Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MCHI and 1.07% for YANG.
YANG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCHI and YANG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer