MCHI vs. YANG
MCHI (iShares MSCI China ETF) and YANG (Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - MCHI is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Index, while YANG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MCHI returned 4.49%/yr vs -38.45%/yr for YANG. At a correlation of -0.94, they often move in opposite directions. MCHI charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for YANG.
Performance
MCHI vs. YANG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCHI achieves a -7.22% return, which is significantly lower than YANG's 19.18% return. Over the past 10 years, MCHI has outperformed YANG with an annualized return of 4.49%, while YANG has yielded a comparatively lower -38.45% annualized return.
MCHI
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -2.60%
- YTD
- -7.22%
- 6M
- -8.98%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- 9.73%
- 5Y*
- -5.76%
- 10Y*
- 4.49%
YANG
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 6.83%
- YTD
- 19.18%
- 6M
- 25.26%
- 1Y
- -7.77%
- 3Y*
- -47.00%
- 5Y*
- -33.67%
- 10Y*
- -38.45%
MCHI vs. YANG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | -7.22% | 31.04% | 17.73% | -11.94% | -23.01% | -21.74% | 27.78% | 23.72% | -19.79% | 54.67% |
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares | 19.18% | -62.77% | -71.41% | 11.95% | -41.34% | 25.90% | -58.66% | -40.72% | 13.14% | -64.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCHI and YANG is -0.97, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2011 | -0.94 |
The correlation between MCHI and YANG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCHI vs. YANG — Risk / Return Rank
MCHI
YANG
MCHI vs. YANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCHI | YANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.03 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | -0.20 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.48 | -0.32 | +0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCHI | YANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | -0.13 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | -0.36 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | -0.47 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | -0.49 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
MCHI vs. YANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCHI drawdown since its inception was -62.95%, smaller than the maximum YANG drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHI and YANG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCHI | YANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.95% | -99.98% | +37.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.17% | -38.85% | +21.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.85% | -94.02% | +68.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.98% | -97.38% | +40.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.95% | -99.53% | +36.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.74% | -99.97% | +63.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.53% | -90.52% | +65.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.36% | 24.39% | -16.03% |
Volatility
MCHI vs. YANG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) is 7.27%, while Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG) has a volatility of 21.22%. This indicates that MCHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCHI | YANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.27% | 21.22% | -13.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.51% | 42.61% | -28.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.16% | 58.74% | -38.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.71% | 94.43% | -63.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.39% | 82.10% | -54.71% |
MCHI vs. YANG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCHI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than YANG's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
MCHI vs. YANG - Dividend Comparison
MCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than YANG's 3.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 2.28% | 2.12% | 2.31% | 2.66% | 1.78% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 2.76% |
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares | 3.43% | 4.03% | 9.42% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 1.54% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCHI and YANG have a correlation of -0.97, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YANG has higher volatility (21.22%) compared to MCHI (7.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCHI dropped -62.95% vs YANG's -99.98%.
On 10-year performance, MCHI leads with 4.49% vs -38.45% for YANG. On fees, MCHI is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MCHI has been the lower-risk option at 7.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MCHI has performed better with a 4.49% return vs -38.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MCHI is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for YANG.
YANG has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 2.28% for MCHI.
MCHI is categorized as China Equities, while YANG is Leveraged Equities. MCHI tracks MSCI China Index, while YANG tracks FTSE China 50 Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MCHI and 1.07% for YANG.
MCHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCHI and YANG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer