MCHI vs. SOXX
MCHI (iShares MSCI China ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MCHI is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MCHI returned 4.19%/yr vs 37.13%/yr for SOXX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MCHI charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
MCHI vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCHI achieves a -14.90% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 107.83% return. Over the past 10 years, MCHI has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 4.19%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 37.13% annualized return.
MCHI
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -8.88%
- YTD
- -14.90%
- 6M
- -15.66%
- 1Y
- -6.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.30%
- 5Y*
- -7.48%
- 10Y*
- 4.19%
SOXX
- 1D
- 3.94%
- 1M
- 9.72%
- YTD
- 107.83%
- 6M
- 104.44%
- 1Y
- 164.79%
- 3Y*
- 57.87%
- 5Y*
- 34.72%
- 10Y*
- 37.13%
MCHI vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | -14.90% | 31.04% | 17.73% | -11.94% | -23.01% | -21.74% | 27.78% | 23.72% | -19.79% | 54.67% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 107.83% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCHI and SOXX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.53 |
The correlation between MCHI and SOXX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MCHI vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MCHI
SOXX
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
MCHI
SOXX
-
Financial Services
MCHI
SOXX
-
Communication Services
MCHI
SOXX
-
Technology
MCHI
SOXX
Basic Materials
MCHI
SOXX
-
Industrials
MCHI
SOXX
-
Healthcare
MCHI
SOXX
-
Energy
MCHI
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
MCHI
SOXX
-
Utilities
MCHI
SOXX
-
Real Estate
MCHI
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCHI vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
MCHI
SOXX
MCHI vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCHI | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.59 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 10.52 | -10.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | 37.47 | -38.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCHI vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCHI drawdown since its inception was -62.95%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHI and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCHI | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.95% | -70.21% | +7.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.76% | -15.77% | -6.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.85% | -41.36% | +15.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.98% | -45.75% | -11.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.95% | -45.75% | -17.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.97% | -4.55% | -37.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.57% | -19.93% | -4.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.49% | 4.42% | +5.07% |
Volatility
MCHI vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) is 6.05%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 22.27%. This indicates that MCHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCHI | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | 22.27% | -16.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.90% | 33.54% | -18.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.15% | 39.44% | -19.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.74% | 37.24% | -6.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.34% | 34.00% | -6.66% |
MCHI vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCHI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
MCHI vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
MCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than SOXX's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 2.16% | 2.12% | 2.31% | 2.66% | 1.78% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 2.76% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.23% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCHI and SOXX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (22.27%) compared to MCHI (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCHI dropped -62.95% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 37.13% vs 4.19% for MCHI. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, MCHI has been the lower-risk option at 6.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 37.13% return vs 4.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MCHI.
MCHI has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.23% for SOXX.
MCHI is categorized as China Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. MCHI tracks MSCI China Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MCHI and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCHI and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer