MCHI vs. CBON
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON).
MCHI and CBON are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MCHI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Index. It was launched on Mar 29, 2011. CBON is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the ChinaBond China High Quality Bond Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2014. Both MCHI and CBON are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MCHI vs. CBON - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MCHI vs. CBON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | -6.78% | 31.04% | 17.73% | -11.94% | -23.01% | -21.74% | 27.78% | 23.72% | -19.79% | 54.67% |
CBON VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF | 2.56% | 5.46% | 1.85% | 2.92% | -7.99% | 5.93% | 12.01% | 2.67% | 1.88% | 6.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCHI achieves a -6.78% return, which is significantly lower than CBON's 2.56% return. Over the past 10 years, MCHI has outperformed CBON with an annualized return of 4.62%, while CBON has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.
MCHI
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -6.78%
- 6M
- -14.44%
- 1Y
- 4.94%
- 3Y*
- 6.44%
- 5Y*
- -5.72%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
CBON
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 2.56%
- 6M
- 5.23%
- 1Y
- 7.99%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- 2.20%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCHI vs. CBON - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCHI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CBON's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MCHI vs. CBON — Risk / Return Rank
MCHI
CBON
MCHI vs. CBON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCHI | CBON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.21 | 2.05 | -1.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.45 | 2.96 | -2.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.41 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 4.68 | -4.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.79 | 19.84 | -19.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCHI | CBON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 2.05 | -1.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | 0.45 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | 0.44 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.39 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between MCHI and CBON is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MCHI vs. CBON - Dividend Comparison
MCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than CBON's 1.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 2.27% | 2.12% | 2.31% | 2.66% | 1.78% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 2.76% |
CBON VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF | 1.63% | 1.66% | 2.15% | 3.01% | 2.70% | 3.05% | 2.87% | 3.87% | 3.39% | 3.33% | 3.25% | 2.78% |
Drawdowns
MCHI vs. CBON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCHI drawdown since its inception was -62.95%, which is greater than CBON's maximum drawdown of -14.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHI and CBON.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCHI | CBON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.95% | -14.13% | -48.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.17% | -1.66% | -15.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.18% | -14.13% | -43.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.95% | -14.13% | -48.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.43% | 0.00% | -36.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.40% | -4.05% | -20.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.63% | 0.39% | +6.24% |
Volatility
MCHI vs. CBON - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) at 1.26%. This indicates that MCHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MCHI | CBON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.82% | 1.26% | +5.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.83% | 2.50% | +12.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.85% | 3.93% | +19.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.67% | 4.96% | +25.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.39% | 5.60% | +21.79% |