MCFIX vs. MRBIX
MCFIX (Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund) and MRBIX (MFS Total Return Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, MCFIX returned -0.03%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for MRBIX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MCFIX charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for MRBIX.
Performance
MCFIX vs. MRBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCFIX achieves a -1.10% return, which is significantly lower than MRBIX's 0.52% return.
MCFIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- -1.02%
- 1Y
- 3.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- -0.03%
- 10Y*
- —
MRBIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 4.35%
- 5Y*
- 0.23%
- 10Y*
- 1.97%
MCFIX vs. MRBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCFIX Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund | -1.10% | 6.64% | 2.02% | 6.47% | -13.69% | -1.05% | 4.75% | 3.31% |
MRBIX MFS Total Return Bond Fund | 0.52% | 7.35% | 1.77% | 6.45% | -14.52% | -0.84% | 8.83% | 6.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCFIX and MRBIX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between MCFIX and MRBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCFIX vs. MRBIX — Risk / Return Rank
MCFIX
MRBIX
MCFIX vs. MRBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) and MFS Total Return Bond Fund (MRBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCFIX | MRBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 1.48 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 2.24 | -0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.27 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 2.06 | -1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 6.03 | -3.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCFIX | MRBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.48 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.04 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.97 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
MCFIX vs. MRBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCFIX drawdown since its inception was -21.68%, which is greater than MRBIX's maximum drawdown of -19.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCFIX and MRBIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCFIX | MRBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.68% | -19.25% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.75% | -2.77% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.32% | -6.29% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.72% | -19.25% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.08% | -1.29% | -4.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -2.47% | -6.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.27% | 0.94% | +0.33% |
Volatility
MCFIX vs. MRBIX - Volatility Comparison
Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) and MFS Total Return Bond Fund (MRBIX) have volatilities of 1.32% and 1.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCFIX | MRBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 1.35% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 2.73% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.12% | 3.86% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.04% | 5.73% | +0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 4.92% | +1.20% |
MCFIX vs. MRBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCFIX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than MRBIX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
MCFIX vs. MRBIX - Dividend Comparison
MCFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than MRBIX's 4.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCFIX Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund | 4.31% | 3.89% | 4.54% | 3.68% | 3.31% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MRBIX MFS Total Return Bond Fund | 4.17% | 4.21% | 3.69% | 3.42% | 2.39% | 3.42% | 3.00% | 3.06% | 2.87% | 2.65% | 3.02% | 3.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCFIX and MRBIX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRBIX has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to MCFIX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCFIX dropped -21.68% vs MRBIX's -19.25%.
MRBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCFIX and MRBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer