PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCFIX vs. AMFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCFIX vs. AMFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCFIX achieves a -1.10% return, which is significantly lower than AMFIX's 0.30% return.


MCFIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
-1.10%
6M
-0.91%
1Y
3.23%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
-0.06%
10Y*

AMFIX

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.52%
1Y
2.53%
3Y*
3.31%
5Y*
0.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCFIX vs. AMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MCFIX
Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund
-1.10%6.64%2.02%6.47%-13.69%-1.05%4.75%3.31%
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
0.30%3.74%3.48%3.84%-6.26%-1.37%2.24%1.80%

Correlation

The correlation between MCFIX and AMFIX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019

0.79

The correlation between MCFIX and AMFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCFIX vs. AMFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCFIX
MCFIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MCFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MCFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

AMFIX
AMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
AMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCFIX vs. AMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCFIXAMFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

2.39

-1.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

3.74

-2.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.50

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

3.42

-2.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.01

11.59

-8.58

MCFIX vs. AMFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the AMFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCFIX and AMFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCFIXAMFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

2.39

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.34

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.56

-0.42

Drawdowns

MCFIX vs. AMFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCFIX drawdown since its inception was -21.68%, which is greater than AMFIX's maximum drawdown of -9.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCFIX and AMFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCFIXAMFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.68%

-9.35%

-12.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.75%

-0.74%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.32%

-0.88%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.72%

-8.91%

-9.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.08%

-0.39%

-5.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.55%

-2.03%

-6.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

0.22%

+1.04%

Volatility

MCFIX vs. AMFIX - Volatility Comparison

Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) at 0.41%. This indicates that MCFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCFIXAMFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

0.41%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.77%

0.83%

+1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.13%

1.05%

+3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.04%

2.17%

+3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.12%

1.74%

+4.38%

MCFIX vs. AMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCFIX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFIX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCFIX vs. AMFIX - Dividend Comparison

MCFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than AMFIX's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
2.21%2.08%2.44%1.70%0.83%0.57%0.83%1.24%1.24%0.40%
MCFIX
Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund
4.31%3.89%4.54%3.68%3.31%2.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCFIX and AMFIX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCFIX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to AMFIX (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCFIX dropped -21.68% vs AMFIX's -9.35%.

AMFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCFIX and AMFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer