MCFIX vs. AMFIX
MCFIX (Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund) and AMFIX (AAMA Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, MCFIX returned -0.06%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for AMFIX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MCFIX charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for AMFIX.
Performance
MCFIX vs. AMFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCFIX achieves a -1.10% return, which is significantly lower than AMFIX's 0.30% return.
MCFIX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- -0.91%
- 1Y
- 3.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- -0.06%
- 10Y*
- —
AMFIX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 2.53%
- 3Y*
- 3.31%
- 5Y*
- 0.74%
- 10Y*
- —
MCFIX vs. AMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCFIX Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund | -1.10% | 6.64% | 2.02% | 6.47% | -13.69% | -1.05% | 4.75% | 3.31% |
AMFIX AAMA Income Fund | 0.30% | 3.74% | 3.48% | 3.84% | -6.26% | -1.37% | 2.24% | 1.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCFIX and AMFIX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019 | 0.79 |
The correlation between MCFIX and AMFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCFIX vs. AMFIX — Risk / Return Rank
MCFIX
AMFIX
MCFIX vs. AMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCFIX | AMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 2.39 | -1.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 3.74 | -2.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.50 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 3.42 | -2.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.01 | 11.59 | -8.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCFIX | AMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 2.39 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.34 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.56 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
MCFIX vs. AMFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCFIX drawdown since its inception was -21.68%, which is greater than AMFIX's maximum drawdown of -9.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCFIX and AMFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCFIX | AMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.68% | -9.35% | -12.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.75% | -0.74% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.32% | -0.88% | -5.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.72% | -8.91% | -9.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.08% | -0.39% | -5.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.55% | -2.03% | -6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 0.22% | +1.04% |
Volatility
MCFIX vs. AMFIX - Volatility Comparison
Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) at 0.41%. This indicates that MCFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCFIX | AMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 0.41% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 0.83% | +1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.13% | 1.05% | +3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.04% | 2.17% | +3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 1.74% | +4.38% |
MCFIX vs. AMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCFIX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFIX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Dividends
MCFIX vs. AMFIX - Dividend Comparison
MCFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than AMFIX's 2.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMFIX AAMA Income Fund | 2.21% | 2.08% | 2.44% | 1.70% | 0.83% | 0.57% | 0.83% | 1.24% | 1.24% | 0.40% |
MCFIX Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund | 4.31% | 3.89% | 4.54% | 3.68% | 3.31% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCFIX and AMFIX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MCFIX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to AMFIX (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCFIX dropped -21.68% vs AMFIX's -9.35%.
AMFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCFIX and AMFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer