PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRBIX vs. BMSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRBIX vs. BMSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Total Return Bond Fund (MRBIX) and BlackRock Income Fund (BMSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRBIX achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly higher than BMSIX's 0.35% return. Over the past 10 years, MRBIX has underperformed BMSIX with an annualized return of 1.96%, while BMSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.85% annualized return.


MRBIX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.87%
YTD
0.52%
6M
0.89%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
4.35%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
1.96%

BMSIX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.65%
YTD
0.35%
6M
1.05%
1Y
5.63%
3Y*
6.79%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
3.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRBIX vs. BMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MRBIX
MFS Total Return Bond Fund
0.52%7.35%1.77%6.45%-14.52%-0.84%8.83%9.96%-1.03%4.15%
BMSIX
BlackRock Income Fund
0.35%8.38%5.96%7.84%-10.08%-0.29%6.94%12.03%-1.03%6.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MRBIX and BMSIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2010

0.60

Over the past year, MRBIX and BMSIX have become more correlated (0.82) than their long-term average of 0.60, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRBIX vs. BMSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRBIX
MRBIX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MRBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MRBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

BMSIX
BMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRBIX vs. BMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Total Return Bond Fund (MRBIX) and BlackRock Income Fund (BMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MRBIXBMSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.41

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.25

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.03

9.47

-4.44

MRBIX vs. BMSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the BMSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRBIX and BMSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MRBIX vs. BMSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.25%, roughly equal to the maximum BMSIX drawdown of -18.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRBIX and BMSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRBIXBMSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.25%

-18.60%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-2.51%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.29%

-2.58%

-3.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.25%

-16.52%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.25%

-18.60%

-0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-0.37%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-2.03%

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.60%

+0.40%

Volatility

MRBIX vs. BMSIX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Total Return Bond Fund (MRBIX) has a higher volatility of 1.21% compared to BlackRock Income Fund (BMSIX) at 0.99%. This indicates that MRBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRBIXBMSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

0.99%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

2.36%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.78%

2.89%

+0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.73%

3.78%

+1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.92%

4.15%

+0.77%

MRBIX vs. BMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRBIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BMSIX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

MRBIX vs. BMSIX - Dividend Comparison

MRBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, less than BMSIX's 5.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMSIX
BlackRock Income Fund
5.64%5.66%5.99%4.38%3.71%5.31%4.19%4.90%5.13%4.03%4.49%4.35%
MRBIX
MFS Total Return Bond Fund
4.17%4.21%3.69%3.42%2.39%3.42%3.00%3.06%2.87%2.65%3.02%3.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRBIX and BMSIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRBIX has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to BMSIX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRBIX dropped -19.25% vs BMSIX's -18.60%.

BMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRBIX and BMSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer