PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRBIX vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRBIX vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Total Return Bond Fund (MRBIX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRBIX achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than BND's -0.30% return. Over the past 10 years, MRBIX has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 1.68%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.40% annualized return.


MRBIX

1D
-0.32%
1M
-1.47%
6M
-0.87%
YTD
-0.73%
1Y
1.78%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
-0.45%
10Y*
1.68%
ALL TIME*
4.18%

BND

1D
0.24%
1M
-0.97%
6M
-0.42%
YTD
-0.30%
1Y
2.00%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
-0.43%
10Y*
1.40%
ALL TIME*
3.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$459.14M$504.12M$590.88M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MRBIX vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MRBIX
MFS Total Return Bond Fund
-0.73%7.35%1.77%6.45%-14.52%-0.84%8.83%9.96%-1.03%4.15%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
-0.30%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between MRBIX and BND is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007

0.84

The correlation between MRBIX and BND shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRBIX vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MRBIX
MRBIX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MRBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MRBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MRBIX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Total Return Bond Fund (MRBIX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MRBIXBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.09

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

0.75

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.25

1.86

+0.38

MRBIX vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRBIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is comparable to the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRBIX and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MRBIX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.25%, roughly equal to the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRBIX and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRBIXBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.25%

-18.58%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-2.68%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.42%

-4.81%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.25%

-17.81%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.25%

-18.58%

-0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-2.92%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-3.06%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

1.07%

+0.06%

Volatility

MRBIX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Total Return Bond Fund (MRBIX) is 0.91%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.02%. This indicates that MRBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRBIXBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

1.02%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

2.91%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

3.61%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.73%

6.03%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.92%

5.53%

-0.61%

MRBIX vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRBIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MRBIX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

MRBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than BND's 4.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
4.04%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
MRBIX
MFS Total Return Bond Fund
3.86%4.21%3.69%3.42%2.39%3.42%3.00%3.06%2.87%2.65%3.02%3.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MRBIX and BND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BND has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to MRBIX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRBIX dropped -19.25% vs BND's -18.58%.

MRBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRBIX and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer