MCDWX vs. LSSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX).
MCDWX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Apr 15, 2020. LSSAX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on Mar 2, 2006.
Performance
MCDWX vs. LSSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MCDWX vs. LSSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series | -0.35% | 7.57% | 4.13% | 7.31% | -11.13% | 0.01% | 8.77% |
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 0.55% | 8.32% | 3.94% | 7.01% | -11.82% | 0.64% | 5.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCDWX achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly lower than LSSAX's 0.55% return.
MCDWX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- 5.19%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- —
LSSAX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 5.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- 1.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCDWX vs. LSSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCDWX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than LSSAX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
MCDWX vs. LSSAX — Risk / Return Rank
MCDWX
LSSAX
MCDWX vs. LSSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCDWX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.44 | 1.46 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.03 | 2.22 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.27 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 3.63 | -1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.65 | 10.62 | -1.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCDWX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 1.46 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.26 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.95 | -0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between MCDWX and LSSAX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MCDWX vs. LSSAX - Dividend Comparison
MCDWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than LSSAX's 3.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series | 4.44% | 4.83% | 4.41% | 4.48% | 3.25% | 4.45% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 3.93% | 4.23% | 4.54% | 5.65% | 6.47% | 6.38% | 5.95% | 5.48% | 5.62% | 5.42% | 5.12% | 5.20% |
Drawdowns
MCDWX vs. LSSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCDWX drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, roughly equal to the maximum LSSAX drawdown of -16.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCDWX and LSSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCDWX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | -16.40% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.20% | -2.45% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.96% | -16.40% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -1.28% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -1.98% | -2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.60% | 0.84% | -0.24% |
Volatility
MCDWX vs. LSSAX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) has a higher volatility of 1.41% compared to Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) at 1.24%. This indicates that MCDWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MCDWX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 1.24% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.99% | 2.68% | -0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.32% | 4.69% | -1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.62% | 5.73% | -1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.41% | 4.39% | +0.02% |