MCD vs. XLP
MCD (McDonald's Corporation) is a stock, while XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, MCD returned 11.46%/yr vs 7.60%/yr for XLP. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MCD vs. XLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCD achieves a -5.66% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 11.10% return. Over the past 10 years, MCD has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 11.46%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.60% annualized return.
MCD
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- -5.66%
- 6M
- -8.96%
- 1Y
- -3.37%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
XLP
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
MCD vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCD McDonald's Corporation | -5.66% | 7.89% | 0.14% | 15.06% | 0.51% | 27.79% | 11.30% | 13.97% | 5.78% | 45.05% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 11.10% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCD and XLP is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.46 |
The correlation between MCD and XLP shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCD vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank
MCD
XLP
MCD vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McDonald's Corporation (MCD) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCD | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.11 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 0.79 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 1.52 | -2.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCD vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCD drawdown since its inception was -73.20%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCD and XLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCD | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.20% | -35.90% | -37.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.05% | -9.69% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.05% | -12.39% | -6.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.05% | -16.30% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.90% | -24.51% | -12.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.46% | -4.12% | -11.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.89% | -7.06% | -7.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.53% | 5.01% | +2.52% |
Volatility
MCD vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison
McDonald's Corporation (MCD) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 4.53%. This indicates that MCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCD | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 4.53% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.20% | 10.14% | +2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.62% | 12.90% | +3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 13.34% | +3.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 14.75% | +5.65% |
Dividends
MCD vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison
MCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than XLP's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCD McDonald's Corporation | 2.58% | 2.35% | 2.34% | 2.10% | 2.15% | 1.96% | 2.35% | 2.39% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.97% | 2.91% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.53% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCD and XLP have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MCD has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to XLP (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCD dropped -73.20% vs XLP's -35.90%.
XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCD and XLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer