MC.PA vs. PEP
MC.PA (LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne) and PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) are both stocks. MC.PA operates in Luxury Goods (Consumer Cyclical), while PEP operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, MC.PA returned 16.10%/yr vs 6.28%/yr for PEP. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MC.PA vs. PEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MC.PA is traded in EUR, while PEP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PEP values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MC.PA achieves a -19.55% return, which is significantly lower than PEP's 4.06% return. Over the past 10 years, MC.PA has outperformed PEP with an annualized return of 16.10%, while PEP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.28% annualized return.
MC.PA
- 1D
- 3.53%
- 1M
- 10.80%
- YTD
- -19.55%
- 6M
- -16.91%
- 1Y
- 13.44%
- 3Y*
- -13.46%
- 5Y*
- -3.38%
- 10Y*
- 16.10%
PEP
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 4.06%
- 6M
- -0.92%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- -6.29%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 6.28%
MC.PA vs. PEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MC.PA LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne | -19.55% | 3.93% | -11.73% | 9.60% | -4.76% | 43.83% | 24.66% | 63.17% | 7.31% | 37.90% |
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 4.06% | -13.49% | -1.50% | -6.19% | 13.40% | 29.57% | 2.47% | 30.25% | -0.35% | 3.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MC.PA and PEP is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MC.PA vs. PEP — Risk / Return Rank
MC.PA
PEP
MC.PA vs. PEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MC.PA | PEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.13 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 0.91 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.74 | 2.31 | -1.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MC.PA vs. PEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MC.PA drawdown since its inception was -54.74%, which is greater than PEP's maximum drawdown of -35.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MC.PA and PEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MC.PA | PEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.74% | -35.00% | -19.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.65% | -14.95% | -15.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.87% | -32.35% | -16.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.03% | -35.00% | -14.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.03% | -35.00% | -14.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.02% | -23.12% | -15.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.08% | -9.07% | -3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.58% | 5.89% | +9.69% |
Volatility
MC.PA vs. PEP - Volatility Comparison
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) at 6.03%. This indicates that MC.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MC.PA | PEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 6.03% | +1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.54% | 15.47% | +6.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.28% | 22.13% | +9.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.90% | 19.14% | +10.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.93% | 20.58% | +7.35% |
Dividends
MC.PA vs. PEP - Dividend Comparison
MC.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than PEP's 3.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MC.PA LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne | 2.55% | 2.02% | 2.05% | 1.70% | 1.76% | 0.96% | 0.90% | 1.50% | 2.09% | 1.71% | 1.98% | 2.28% |
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 3.98% | 3.92% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 2.50% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.77% | 3.25% | 2.64% | 2.83% | 2.76% |
Financials
MC.PA vs. PEP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne and PepsiCo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MC.PA and PEP have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MC.PA and PEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer