PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBXIX vs. MBXAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBXIX vs. MBXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MBXIX having a 13.75% return and MBXAX slightly lower at 13.56%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MBXIX having a 7.85% annualized return and MBXAX not far behind at 7.59%.


MBXIX

1D
0.74%
1M
-1.29%
6M
9.25%
YTD
13.75%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
10.06%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
7.85%
ALL TIME*
9.02%

MBXAX

1D
0.73%
1M
-1.32%
6M
9.10%
YTD
13.56%
1Y
18.00%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
7.59%
ALL TIME*
8.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MBXIX vs. MBXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
13.75%4.35%13.49%-0.67%7.72%16.89%-0.45%13.83%-2.16%13.99%
MBXAX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund
13.56%4.13%13.17%-0.91%7.46%16.62%-0.72%13.59%-2.43%13.69%

Correlation

The correlation between MBXIX and MBXAX is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

1.00

The correlation between MBXIX and MBXAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBXIX vs. MBXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MBXIX
MBXIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MBXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MBXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

MBXAX
MBXAX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MBXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MBXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MBXIX vs. MBXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MBXIXMBXAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.44

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

4.17

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.67

16.27

+0.40

MBXIX vs. MBXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBXIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the MBXAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBXIX and MBXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MBXIX vs. MBXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBXIX drawdown since its inception was -31.73%, roughly equal to the maximum MBXAX drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBXIX and MBXAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBXIXMBXAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.73%

-31.75%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.85%

-3.89%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.59%

-15.66%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.59%

-15.66%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.73%

-31.75%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-1.98%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-4.00%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.01%

0.00%

Volatility

MBXIX vs. MBXAX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) have volatilities of 1.78% and 1.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBXIXMBXAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

1.78%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.94%

4.91%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.93%

6.90%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.40%

11.39%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.36%

13.36%

0.00%

MBXIX vs. MBXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBXIX has a 2.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXAX's 2.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBXIX vs. MBXAX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MBXIX nor MBXAX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MBXAX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund
0.00%0.00%2.43%2.02%7.57%0.00%3.92%4.96%3.07%3.35%1.82%
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%2.63%2.25%7.74%0.00%4.27%5.18%3.33%3.33%1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, MBXIX and MBXAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MBXAX has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to MBXIX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBXIX dropped -31.73% vs MBXAX's -31.75%.

MBXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBXIX and MBXAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer