MBXIX vs. MBXAX
MBXIX (Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I) and MBXAX (Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund) are both Multistrategy funds from Catalyst Mutual Funds. Over the past 10 years, MBXIX returned 7.85%/yr vs 7.59%/yr for MBXAX. Their 1.00 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. MBXIX charges 2.04%/yr vs 2.18%/yr for MBXAX.
Performance
MBXIX vs. MBXAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MBXIX having a 13.75% return and MBXAX slightly lower at 13.56%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MBXIX having a 7.85% annualized return and MBXAX not far behind at 7.59%.
MBXIX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 1Y
- 18.31%
- 3Y*
- 10.06%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.02%
MBXAX
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- YTD
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 18.00%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.27%
- 10Y*
- 7.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MBXIX vs. MBXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I | 13.75% | 4.35% | 13.49% | -0.67% | 7.72% | 16.89% | -0.45% | 13.83% | -2.16% | 13.99% |
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund | 13.56% | 4.13% | 13.17% | -0.91% | 7.46% | 16.62% | -0.72% | 13.59% | -2.43% | 13.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBXIX and MBXAX is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 1.00 |
The correlation between MBXIX and MBXAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBXIX vs. MBXAX — Risk / Return Rank
MBXIX
MBXAX
MBXIX vs. MBXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MBXIX | MBXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.44 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | 4.17 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.67 | 16.27 | +0.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBXIX vs. MBXAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBXIX drawdown since its inception was -31.73%, roughly equal to the maximum MBXAX drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBXIX and MBXAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBXIX | MBXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.73% | -31.75% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.85% | -3.89% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.59% | -15.66% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.59% | -15.66% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.73% | -31.75% | +0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.96% | -1.98% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -4.00% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 1.01% | 0.00% |
Volatility
MBXIX vs. MBXAX - Volatility Comparison
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) have volatilities of 1.78% and 1.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBXIX | MBXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 1.78% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.94% | 4.91% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.93% | 6.90% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.40% | 11.39% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 13.36% | 0.00% |
MBXIX vs. MBXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBXIX has a 2.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXAX's 2.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBXIX vs. MBXAX - Dividend Comparison
Neither MBXIX nor MBXAX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.43% | 2.02% | 7.57% | 0.00% | 3.92% | 4.96% | 3.07% | 3.35% | 1.82% |
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.63% | 2.25% | 7.74% | 0.00% | 4.27% | 5.18% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 1.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, MBXIX and MBXAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MBXAX has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to MBXIX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBXIX dropped -31.73% vs MBXAX's -31.75%.
MBXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MBXIX and MBXAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer