MBXIX vs. CLPAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MBXIX (Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I) and CLPAX (Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - MBXIX is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds, while CLPAX is a Derivative Income fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. Over the past 10 years, MBXIX returned 8.56%/yr vs 8.09%/yr for CLPAX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MBXIX charges 2.04%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for CLPAX.

Performance

MBXIX vs. CLPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) and Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBXIX achieves a 13.11% return, which is significantly lower than CLPAX's 17.67% return. Over the past 10 years, MBXIX has outperformed CLPAX with an annualized return of 8.56%, while CLPAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.09% annualized return.

MBXIX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -0.91%
• YTD: 13.11%
• 6M: 14.07%
• 1Y: 19.89%
• 3Y*: 11.65%
• 5Y*: 7.53%
• 10Y*: 8.56%

CLPAX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 9.92%
• YTD: 17.67%
• 6M: 12.98%
• 1Y: 29.30%
• 3Y*: 17.72%
• 5Y*: 9.79%
• 10Y*: 8.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBXIX vs. CLPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I	13.11%	4.35%	13.49%	-0.67%	7.72%	16.89%	-0.45%	13.83%	-2.16%	13.99%
CLPAX Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund	17.67%	12.32%	11.42%	35.92%	-30.54%	13.11%	5.25%	19.41%	-3.65%	8.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MBXIX and CLPAX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2015	0.46

The correlation between MBXIX and CLPAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MBXIX vs. CLPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBXIX

MBXIX Risk / Return Rank: 91
MBXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
MBXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MBXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
MBXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
MBXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

CLPAX

CLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 44
CLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
CLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
CLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
CLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBXIX vs. CLPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) and Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MBXIX	CLPAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.99	2.21	+0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.42	3.03	+1.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.38	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.47	2.34	+3.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.15	6.55	+14.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MBXIX vs. CLPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBXIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the CLPAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBXIX and CLPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MBXIX	CLPAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.99	2.21	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.62	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.56	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.47	+0.22

Drawdowns

MBXIX vs. CLPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBXIX drawdown since its inception was -31.73%, roughly equal to the maximum CLPAX drawdown of -32.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBXIX and CLPAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBXIX	CLPAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.73%	-32.47%	+0.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.85%	-12.87%	+9.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.59%	-18.37%	+2.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.59%	-32.47%	+16.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.73%	-32.47%	+0.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.99%	0.00%	-0.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-8.08%	+4.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.99%	4.59%	-3.60%

Volatility

MBXIX vs. CLPAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) is 1.91%, while Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that MBXIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MBXIX	CLPAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.91%	4.95%	-3.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.22%	10.29%	-5.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.05%	13.65%	-6.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.55%	15.82%	-4.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.42%	14.47%	-1.05%

MBXIX vs. CLPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBXIX has a 2.04% expense ratio, which is higher than CLPAX's 1.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

MBXIX vs. CLPAX - Dividend Comparison

MBXIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLPAX Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund	7.74%	9.10%	0.00%	0.00%	2.68%	0.32%	0.49%	5.41%	0.30%	0.02%	0.00%	17.26%
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I	0.00%	0.00%	2.63%	2.25%	7.74%	0.00%	4.27%	5.18%	3.33%	3.33%	1.91%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MBXIX and CLPAX in my portfolio?

MBXIX and CLPAX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MBXIX or CLPAX?

CLPAX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to MBXIX (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBXIX dropped -31.73% vs CLPAX's -32.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MBXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.