PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBXIX vs. BXMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBXIX vs. BXMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) and Blackstone Alternative Multi-Strategy Fund (BXMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBXIX achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than BXMIX's 5.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MBXIX has outperformed BXMIX with an annualized return of 7.85%, while BXMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.39% annualized return.


MBXIX

1D
0.74%
1M
-1.29%
6M
9.25%
YTD
13.75%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
10.06%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
7.85%
ALL TIME*
9.02%

BXMIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
6M
4.71%
YTD
5.29%
1Y
12.61%
3Y*
8.99%
5Y*
5.10%
10Y*
4.39%
ALL TIME*
4.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MBXIX vs. BXMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
13.75%4.35%13.49%-0.67%7.72%16.89%-0.45%13.83%-2.16%13.99%
BXMIX
Blackstone Alternative Multi-Strategy Fund
5.29%10.45%7.45%7.92%-4.62%5.27%-1.10%6.78%-1.51%7.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MBXIX and BXMIX is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2015

0.33

The correlation between MBXIX and BXMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (3 years) to 0.33 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBXIX vs. BXMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MBXIX
MBXIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MBXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MBXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

BXMIX
BXMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BXMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BXMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BXMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BXMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BXMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MBXIX vs. BXMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) and Blackstone Alternative Multi-Strategy Fund (BXMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MBXIXBXMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.93

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

10.09

-5.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.67

38.53

-21.87

MBXIX vs. BXMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBXIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is lower than the BXMIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBXIX and BXMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MBXIX vs. BXMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBXIX drawdown since its inception was -31.73%, which is greater than BXMIX's maximum drawdown of -19.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBXIX and BXMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBXIXBXMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.73%

-19.28%

-12.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.85%

-1.53%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.59%

-8.47%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.59%

-8.56%

-7.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.73%

-19.28%

-12.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-0.17%

-1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-2.48%

-1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.37%

+0.64%

Volatility

MBXIX vs. BXMIX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) has a higher volatility of 1.78% compared to Blackstone Alternative Multi-Strategy Fund (BXMIX) at 1.14%. This indicates that MBXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BXMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBXIXBXMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

1.14%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.94%

2.71%

+2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.93%

3.58%

+3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.40%

6.01%

+5.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.36%

5.26%

+8.10%

MBXIX vs. BXMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBXIX has a 2.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BXMIX's 2.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBXIX vs. BXMIX - Dividend Comparison

MBXIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BXMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BXMIX
Blackstone Alternative Multi-Strategy Fund
7.36%7.75%5.75%3.48%0.00%1.68%3.12%3.67%1.91%2.00%0.45%2.52%
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%2.63%2.25%7.74%0.00%4.27%5.18%3.33%3.33%1.91%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBXIX and BXMIX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBXIX has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to BXMIX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBXIX dropped -31.73% vs BXMIX's -19.28%.

BXMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.32 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBXIX and BXMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer