PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BXMIX vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BXMIX vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackstone Alternative Multi-Strategy Fund (BXMIX) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BXMIX achieves a 5.29% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -18.79% return. Over the past 10 years, BXMIX has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 4.43%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 23.47% annualized return.


BXMIX

1D
0.09%
1M
1.94%
6M
4.52%
YTD
5.29%
1Y
13.12%
3Y*
9.66%
5Y*
4.95%
10Y*
4.43%

MSFT

1D
1.53%
1M
0.06%
6M
-17.70%
YTD
-18.79%
1Y
-21.70%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
7.60%
10Y*
23.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BXMIX vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BXMIX
Blackstone Alternative Multi-Strategy Fund
5.29%10.45%7.45%7.92%-4.62%5.27%-1.10%6.78%-1.51%7.20%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-18.79%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%

Correlation

The correlation between BXMIX and MSFT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BXMIX vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BXMIX
BXMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BXMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BXMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BXMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BXMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BXMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BXMIX vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Alternative Multi-Strategy Fund (BXMIX) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BXMIXMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+8.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.05

0.87

+1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.67

-0.63

+11.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

42.61

-1.18

+43.80

BXMIX vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BXMIX Sharpe Ratio is 4.76, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BXMIX and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BXMIX vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BXMIX drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BXMIX and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BXMIXMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.28%

-69.38%

+50.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.53%

-34.50%

+32.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.47%

-34.50%

+26.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.56%

-37.15%

+28.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.28%

-37.15%

+17.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-27.41%

+27.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

-21.80%

+19.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

18.36%

-18.00%

Volatility

BXMIX vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackstone Alternative Multi-Strategy Fund (BXMIX) is 1.25%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 10.62%. This indicates that BXMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BXMIXMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

10.62%

-9.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.61%

24.24%

-21.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.44%

27.18%

-23.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.01%

27.01%

-21.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.26%

27.17%

-21.91%

Dividends

BXMIX vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

BXMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than MSFT's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BXMIX
Blackstone Alternative Multi-Strategy Fund
7.36%7.75%5.75%3.48%0.00%1.68%3.12%3.67%1.91%2.00%0.45%2.52%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.91%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


BXMIX and MSFT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFT has higher volatility (10.62%) compared to BXMIX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BXMIX dropped -19.28% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

BXMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.76 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BXMIX and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer