PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBX vs. ENTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MBX vs. ENTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MBX Biosciences, Inc (MBX) and Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ENTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBX achieves a 90.68% return, which is significantly higher than ENTA's -16.55% return.


MBX

1D
-4.42%
1M
39.76%
6M
48.38%
YTD
90.68%
1Y
411.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
68.22%

ENTA

1D
-4.22%
1M
3.95%
6M
4.36%
YTD
-16.55%
1Y
74.54%
3Y*
-11.21%
5Y*
-20.55%
10Y*
-5.08%
ALL TIME*
-0.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBX vs. ENTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MBX
MBX Biosciences, Inc
90.68%71.13%-19.87%
ENTA
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-16.55%174.26%-52.83%

Correlation

The correlation between MBX and ENTA is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2024

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MBX:

$2.02B

ENTA:

$305.53M

EPS

MBX:

-$2.22

ENTA:

-$2.60

PB Ratio

MBX:

6.40

ENTA:

3.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

MBX:

$0.00

ENTA:

$69.21M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MBX:

-$160.00K

ENTA:

$33.44M

EBITDA (TTM)

MBX:

-$96.31M

ENTA:

-$61.85M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBX vs. ENTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBX
MBX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

ENTA
ENTA Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ENTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENTA Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ENTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENTA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBX vs. ENTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MBX Biosciences, Inc (MBX) and Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ENTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MBXENTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.29

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.04

2.18

+8.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.14

3.95

+17.20

MBX vs. ENTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBX Sharpe Ratio is 3.08, which is higher than the ENTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBX and ENTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MBX vs. ENTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBX drawdown since its inception was -77.71%, smaller than the maximum ENTA drawdown of -96.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBX and ENTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBXENTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.71%

-96.63%

+18.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.60%

-34.30%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.48%

-89.59%

+81.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.21%

-49.56%

+16.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.60%

18.94%

+0.66%

Volatility

MBX vs. ENTA - Volatility Comparison

MBX Biosciences, Inc (MBX) has a higher volatility of 20.01% compared to Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ENTA) at 14.22%. This indicates that MBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBXENTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.01%

14.22%

+5.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.22%

34.52%

+20.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

134.90%

109.43%

+25.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

117.26%

73.65%

+43.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

117.26%

60.78%

+56.48%

Dividends

MBX vs. ENTA - Dividend Comparison

Neither MBX nor ENTA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MBX vs. ENTA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MBX Biosciences, Inc and Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00M20.00M25.00MOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
17.16M
(MBX) Total Revenue
(ENTA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MBX and ENTA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBX has higher volatility (20.01%) compared to ENTA (14.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBX dropped -77.71% vs ENTA's -96.63%.

MBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBX and ENTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer