MBSF vs. LONZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ).

MBSF and LONZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MBSF is an actively managed fund by Regan. It was launched on Feb 27, 2024. LONZ is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Jun 8, 2022.

Performance

MBSF vs. LONZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MBSF vs. LONZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MBSF Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF	0.75%	5.85%	5.71%
LONZ PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund	-0.25%	5.05%	7.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBSF achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly higher than LONZ's -0.25% return.

MBSF

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: 0.75%
• 6M: 2.41%
• 1Y: 5.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LONZ

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.91%
• YTD: -0.25%
• 6M: 0.74%
• 1Y: 5.26%
• 3Y*: 8.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBSF vs. LONZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBSF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than LONZ's 0.62% expense ratio.

LONZ

PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund

MBSF

Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF

Return for Risk

MBSF vs. LONZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBSF

MBSF Risk / Return Rank: 89
MBSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
MBSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
MBSF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
MBSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
MBSF Martin Ratio Rank: 96

LONZ

LONZ Risk / Return Rank: 70
LONZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
LONZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
LONZ Omega Ratio Rank: 93
LONZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
LONZ Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBSF vs. LONZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MBSF	LONZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	1.33	+0.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	1.56	+1.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.43	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.70	1.53	+5.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.07	8.28	+10.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MBSF vs. LONZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the LONZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBSF and LONZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MBSF	LONZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	1.33	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.74	2.24	-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between MBSF and LONZ is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

MBSF vs. LONZ - Dividend Comparison

MBSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than LONZ's 7.73% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MBSF Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF	4.63%	4.71%	4.14%	0.00%	0.00%
LONZ PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund	7.73%	6.60%	8.16%	8.29%	3.33%

Drawdowns

MBSF vs. LONZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBSF drawdown since its inception was -0.97%, smaller than the maximum LONZ drawdown of -4.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBSF and LONZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBSF	LONZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-4.19%	+3.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.79%	-3.38%	+2.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	-1.03%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.23%	-0.48%	+0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.28%	0.63%	-0.35%

Volatility

MBSF vs. LONZ - Volatility Comparison

Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ) at 1.22%. This indicates that MBSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LONZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MBSF	LONZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.42%	1.22%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.29%	1.99%	+0.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.09%	3.97%	-0.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.42%	3.26%	+0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.42%	3.26%	+0.16%