MBSF vs. EVLN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MBSF (Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF) and EVLN (Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF) are both Bank Loan funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MBSF returned 5.34% vs 4.86% for EVLN. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MBSF charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EVLN.

Performance

MBSF vs. EVLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBSF achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly higher than EVLN's 1.37% return.

MBSF

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 6M: 2.16%
• 1Y: 5.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EVLN

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 1.37%
• 6M: 1.73%
• 1Y: 4.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBSF vs. EVLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MBSF Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF	1.48%	5.85%	5.71%
EVLN Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF	1.37%	5.59%	7.09%

Correlation

The correlation between MBSF and EVLN is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024	0.02

Return for Risk

MBSF vs. EVLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBSF

MBSF Risk / Return Rank: 70
MBSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
MBSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
MBSF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
MBSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
MBSF Martin Ratio Rank: 88

EVLN

EVLN Risk / Return Rank: 73
EVLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
EVLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
EVLN Omega Ratio Rank: 88
EVLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
EVLN Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBSF vs. EVLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MBSF	EVLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.61	-0.82
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	4.39	-1.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.55	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.77	2.76	+4.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.20	9.01	+10.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MBSF vs. EVLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the EVLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBSF and EVLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MBSF	EVLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	2.61	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.74	2.55	-0.81

Drawdowns

MBSF vs. EVLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBSF drawdown since its inception was -0.97%, smaller than the maximum EVLN drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBSF and EVLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBSF	EVLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-2.78%	+1.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.79%	-1.77%	+0.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.04%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.23%	-0.22%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.28%	0.54%	-0.26%

Volatility

MBSF vs. EVLN - Volatility Comparison

Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) has a higher volatility of 0.64% compared to Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) at 0.46%. This indicates that MBSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MBSF	EVLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.64%	0.46%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.16%	1.62%	+0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.01%	1.89%	+1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.34%	2.43%	+0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.34%	2.43%	+0.91%

MBSF vs. EVLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBSF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EVLN's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

MBSF vs. EVLN - Dividend Comparison

MBSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, less than EVLN's 6.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EVLN Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF	6.92%	7.28%	6.41%
MBSF Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF	4.49%	4.71%	4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MBSF and EVLN in my portfolio?

MBSF and EVLN have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MBSF or EVLN?

MBSF has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to EVLN (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBSF dropped -0.97% vs EVLN's -2.78%.

Which ETF is better, MBSF or EVLN?

On 1-year performance, MBSF leads with 5.34% vs 4.86% for EVLN. On fees, MBSF is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EVLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MBSF or EVLN?

Over the 1-year period, MBSF has performed better with a 5.34% return vs 4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MBSF or EVLN?

MBSF is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EVLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MBSF or EVLN?

EVLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 4.49% for MBSF.

What is the main difference between MBSF and EVLN?

They also come from different issuers: Regan and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MBSF and 0.60% for EVLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.