PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBSF vs. AGZD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBSF vs. AGZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBSF achieves a 2.30% return, which is significantly lower than AGZD's 2.83% return.


MBSF

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.25%
6M
1.88%
YTD
2.30%
1Y
5.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.74%

AGZD

1D
0.24%
1M
0.50%
6M
2.10%
YTD
2.83%
1Y
5.51%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
4.44%
10Y*
3.25%
ALL TIME*
2.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.75M$1.75M$1.43M
$1.54M$1.34M$1.61M

MBSF vs. AGZD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MBSF
Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF
2.30%5.85%5.71%
AGZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund
2.83%4.35%5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between MBSF and AGZD is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2024

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBSF vs. AGZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MBSF
MBSF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MBSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBSF Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
MBSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBSF Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

AGZD
AGZD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AGZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGZD Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AGZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGZD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MBSF vs. AGZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MBSFAGZDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.25

7.43

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.49

21.25

-1.76

MBSF vs. AGZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the AGZD Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBSF and AGZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MBSF vs. AGZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBSF drawdown since its inception was -0.97%, smaller than the maximum AGZD drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBSF and AGZD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBSFAGZDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-8.46%

+7.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.79%

-0.73%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.03%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.22%

-0.77%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.26%

0.26%

0.00%

Volatility

MBSF vs. AGZD - Volatility Comparison

Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) has a higher volatility of 0.62% compared to WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD) at 0.42%. This indicates that MBSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBSFAGZDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

0.42%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.07%

1.87%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85%

2.69%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.26%

3.60%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.26%

3.68%

-0.42%

MBSF vs. AGZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBSF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AGZD's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBSF vs. AGZD - Dividend Comparison

MBSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than AGZD's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund
3.97%4.12%3.96%6.07%8.61%1.66%2.28%2.83%2.62%2.31%1.81%1.66%
MBSF
Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF
4.43%4.71%4.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBSF and AGZD have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBSF has higher volatility (0.62%) compared to AGZD (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBSF dropped -0.97% vs AGZD's -8.46%.

On 1-year performance, AGZD leads with 5.51% vs 5.30% for MBSF. On fees, AGZD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, AGZD has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AGZD has performed better with a 5.51% return vs 5.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGZD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MBSF.

MBSF has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 3.97% for AGZD.

MBSF is categorized as Bank Loan, while AGZD is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Regan and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MBSF and 0.23% for AGZD.

AGZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBSF and AGZD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer