PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBOX vs. SCDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBOX vs. SCDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBOX achieves a 15.47% return, which is significantly lower than SCDL's 37.06% return.


MBOX

1D
-0.28%
1M
5.07%
YTD
15.47%
6M
14.89%
1Y
23.95%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*

SCDL

1D
0.51%
1M
5.01%
YTD
37.06%
6M
35.80%
1Y
50.97%
3Y*
22.79%
5Y*
9.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBOX vs. SCDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MBOX
Freedom Day Dividend ETF
15.47%8.72%16.39%15.84%-4.32%9.48%
SCDL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN
37.06%2.05%14.99%0.18%-13.06%16.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MBOX and SCDL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2021

0.87

The correlation between MBOX and SCDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBOX vs. SCDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBOX
MBOX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MBOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
MBOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SCDL
SCDL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SCDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SCDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCDL Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBOX vs. SCDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBOXSCDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

5.03

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.88

12.65

+1.23

MBOX vs. SCDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the SCDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBOX and SCDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBOXSCDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.37

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.33

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.53

+0.30

Drawdowns

MBOX vs. SCDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBOX drawdown since its inception was -16.42%, smaller than the maximum SCDL drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBOX and SCDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBOXSCDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.42%

-34.87%

+18.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.75%

-10.19%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.37%

-32.79%

+16.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.42%

-34.87%

+18.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-2.79%

+2.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-11.96%

+8.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

4.04%

-2.31%

Volatility

MBOX vs. SCDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) is 3.14%, while ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that MBOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBOXSCDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

5.20%

-2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

14.82%

-7.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.76%

21.66%

-10.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.49%

29.02%

-14.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.47%

28.89%

-14.42%

MBOX vs. SCDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBOX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SCDL's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBOX vs. SCDL - Dividend Comparison

MBOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, while SCDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MBOX
Freedom Day Dividend ETF
1.89%1.94%1.60%2.13%2.87%1.17%
SCDL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBOX and SCDL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCDL has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to MBOX (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBOX dropped -16.42% vs SCDL's -34.87%.

On 5-year performance, MBOX leads with 11.86% vs 9.40% for SCDL. On fees, MBOX is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, MBOX has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MBOX has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 9.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MBOX is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCDL.

MBOX has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.00% for SCDL.

MBOX is categorized as Dividend, while SCDL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: EMPIRICAL FINANCE LLC and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MBOX and 0.95% for SCDL.

SCDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBOX and SCDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer