PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBOX vs. SCDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBOX vs. SCDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBOX achieves a 20.13% return, which is significantly lower than SCDL's 47.30% return.


MBOX

1D
0.11%
1M
3.85%
6M
14.65%
YTD
20.13%
1Y
27.96%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
12.70%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.53%

SCDL

1D
0.55%
1M
6.51%
6M
26.03%
YTD
47.30%
1Y
61.99%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
11.62%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$299.35K$251.30K$182.78K
$12.99K$29.73K$21.90K

MBOX vs. SCDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MBOX
Freedom Day Dividend ETF
20.13%8.72%16.39%15.84%-4.32%10.13%
SCDL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN
47.30%2.05%14.99%0.18%-13.06%17.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MBOX and SCDL is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021

0.86

The correlation between MBOX and SCDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBOX vs. SCDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MBOX
MBOX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
MBOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MBOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

SCDL
SCDL Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SCDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCDL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SCDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MBOX vs. SCDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MBOXSCDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.46

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.71

6.00

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.03

15.42

+0.61

MBOX vs. SCDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the SCDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBOX and SCDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MBOX vs. SCDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBOX drawdown since its inception was -16.42%, smaller than the maximum SCDL drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBOX and SCDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBOXSCDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.42%

-34.87%

+18.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.75%

-10.19%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.37%

-32.79%

+16.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.42%

-34.87%

+18.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-2.42%

+1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.37%

-11.68%

+8.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

3.96%

-2.27%

Volatility

MBOX vs. SCDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) is 2.42%, while ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that MBOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBOXSCDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

8.22%

-5.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.55%

15.67%

-8.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.75%

21.95%

-11.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.47%

29.02%

-14.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.33%

28.76%

-14.43%

MBOX vs. SCDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBOX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SCDL's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBOX vs. SCDL - Dividend Comparison

MBOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, while SCDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MBOX
Freedom Day Dividend ETF
1.85%1.94%1.60%2.13%2.87%1.17%
SCDL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBOX and SCDL have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCDL has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to MBOX (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBOX dropped -16.42% vs SCDL's -34.87%.

On 5-year performance, MBOX leads with 12.70% vs 11.62% for SCDL. On fees, MBOX is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, MBOX has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MBOX has performed better with a 12.70% return vs 11.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MBOX is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCDL.

MBOX has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.00% for SCDL.

MBOX is categorized as Dividend, while SCDL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Freedom Day and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MBOX and 0.95% for SCDL.

SCDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBOX and SCDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer