MBOX vs. DVYA
MBOX (Freedom Day Dividend ETF) and DVYA (iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MBOX is a Dividend fund actively managed by EMPIRICAL FINANCE LLC, while DVYA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index. MBOX is actively managed, while DVYA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MBOX returned 11.86%/yr vs 9.88%/yr for DVYA. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MBOX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for DVYA.
Performance
MBOX vs. DVYA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MBOX achieves a 15.47% return, which is significantly higher than DVYA's 13.35% return.
MBOX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 5.07%
- YTD
- 15.47%
- 6M
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- 23.95%
- 3Y*
- 19.61%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- —
DVYA
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 39.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.88%
- 10Y*
- 7.30%
MBOX vs. DVYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBOX Freedom Day Dividend ETF | 15.47% | 8.72% | 16.39% | 15.84% | -4.32% | 9.48% |
DVYA iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF | 13.35% | 30.22% | 6.05% | 13.75% | -2.17% | -6.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBOX and DVYA is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2021 | 0.62 |
The correlation between MBOX and DVYA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
MBOX vs. DVYA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MBOX
DVYA
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
MBOX
DVYA
Technology
MBOX
DVYA
Energy
MBOX
DVYA
Healthcare
MBOX
DVYA
Industrials
MBOX
DVYA
Consumer Defensive
MBOX
DVYA
Basic Materials
MBOX
DVYA
Real Estate
MBOX
DVYA
Utilities
MBOX
DVYA
Communication Services
MBOX
DVYA
Consumer Cyclical
MBOX
DVYA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBOX vs. DVYA — Risk / Return Rank
MBOX
DVYA
MBOX vs. DVYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) and iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MBOX | DVYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.53 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 4.59 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.88 | 16.66 | -2.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBOX | DVYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 3.05 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.66 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.30 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
MBOX vs. DVYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBOX drawdown since its inception was -16.42%, smaller than the maximum DVYA drawdown of -45.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBOX and DVYA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBOX | DVYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.42% | -45.61% | +29.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.75% | -8.64% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.37% | -19.15% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.42% | -25.37% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -3.11% | +2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.46% | -10.06% | +6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 2.38% | -0.65% |
Volatility
MBOX vs. DVYA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) is 3.14%, while iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that MBOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DVYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBOX | DVYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 3.94% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.81% | 10.44% | -2.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.76% | 13.00% | -2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.49% | 15.08% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 17.55% | -3.08% |
MBOX vs. DVYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBOX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DVYA's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBOX vs. DVYA - Dividend Comparison
MBOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than DVYA's 4.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVYA iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF | 4.33% | 4.71% | 5.97% | 6.48% | 7.29% | 5.81% | 3.66% | 5.52% | 6.24% | 4.74% | 4.79% | 5.33% |
MBOX Freedom Day Dividend ETF | 1.89% | 1.94% | 1.60% | 2.13% | 2.87% | 1.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBOX and DVYA have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DVYA has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to MBOX (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBOX dropped -16.42% vs DVYA's -45.61%.
On 5-year performance, MBOX leads with 11.86% vs 9.88% for DVYA. On fees, MBOX is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, MBOX has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MBOX has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 9.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MBOX is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DVYA.
DVYA has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 1.89% for MBOX.
MBOX is categorized as Dividend, while DVYA is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: EMPIRICAL FINANCE LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MBOX and 0.49% for DVYA.
DVYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MBOX and DVYA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer