PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBOX vs. DBMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MBOX vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MBOX vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MBOX
Freedom Day Dividend ETF
5.04%8.72%16.39%15.84%-4.32%9.48%
DBMF
iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
7.87%13.85%7.24%-8.94%21.61%0.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBOX achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 7.87% return.


MBOX

1D
0.93%
1M
-4.03%
YTD
5.04%
6M
4.92%
1Y
12.49%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
10Y*

DBMF

1D
-0.20%
1M
-3.82%
YTD
7.87%
6M
15.44%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MBOX vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBOX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MBOX vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBOX
MBOX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MBOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
MBOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBOX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

DBMF
DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBOX vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBOXDBMFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

2.19

-1.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.23

2.98

-1.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.46

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

4.25

-3.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.23

18.51

-13.27

MBOX vs. DBMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBOX and DBMF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBOXDBMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

2.19

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.74

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between MBOX and DBMF is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MBOX vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

MBOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than DBMF's 5.30% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
MBOX
Freedom Day Dividend ETF
2.08%1.94%1.60%2.13%2.87%1.17%0.00%0.00%
DBMF
iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
5.30%5.91%5.75%2.91%7.72%10.38%0.86%9.35%

Drawdowns

MBOX vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBOX drawdown since its inception was -16.42%, smaller than the maximum DBMF drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBOX and DBMF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MBOXDBMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.42%

-20.39%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.16%

-6.10%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.32%

-3.82%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-6.70%

+3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

1.40%

+1.20%

Volatility

MBOX vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) is 3.31%, while iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that MBOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MBOXDBMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

5.24%

-1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.14%

11.10%

-2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

12.09%

+3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.58%

12.66%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.58%

12.48%

+2.10%