MBNE vs. BMNU
MBNE (SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF) and BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MBNE is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by State Street, while BMNU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. MBNE charges 0.43%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for BMNU.
Performance
MBNE vs. BMNU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MBNE achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly higher than BMNU's -73.22% return.
MBNE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- 2.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNU
- 1D
- 10.82%
- 1M
- -43.61%
- YTD
- -73.22%
- 6M
- -86.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBNE vs. BMNU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MBNE SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF | 0.84% | 1.09% |
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | -73.22% | -81.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBNE and BMNU is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBNE vs. BMNU — Risk / Return Rank
MBNE
BMNU
MBNE vs. BMNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF (MBNE) and T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MBNE | BMNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.16 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBNE | BMNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | -0.53 | +1.15 |
Drawdowns
MBNE vs. BMNU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBNE drawdown since its inception was -6.19%, smaller than the maximum BMNU drawdown of -97.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBNE and BMNU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBNE | BMNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -97.05% | +90.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -96.73% | +95.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -79.79% | +78.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | — | — |
Volatility
MBNE vs. BMNU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBNE | BMNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85% | 187.61% | -184.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 187.61% | -183.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 187.61% | -183.91% |
MBNE vs. BMNU - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBNE has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than BMNU's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBNE vs. BMNU - Dividend Comparison
MBNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, while BMNU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MBNE SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF | 3.15% | 3.63% | 3.32% | 3.01% | 1.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBNE and BMNU have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MBNE is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MBNE is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.
MBNE has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 0.00% for BMNU.
MBNE is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BMNU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for MBNE and 1.50% for BMNU.
Find the right allocation for MBNE and BMNU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer