MBCE vs. VEGN
MBCE (Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF) and VEGN (US Vegan Climate ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - MBCE tracks the Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index while VEGN tracks the US Vegan Climate Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MBCE charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for VEGN.
Performance
MBCE vs. VEGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBCE
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VEGN
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 27.57%
- YTD
- 29.54%
- 1Y
- 41.53%
- 3Y*
- 26.19%
- 5Y*
- 15.18%
- 10Y*
- —
MBCE vs. VEGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF | -0.76% |
VEGN US Vegan Climate ETF | -2.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBCE and VEGN is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBCE vs. VEGN — Risk / Return Rank
MBCE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VEGN
MBCE vs. VEGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MBCE | VEGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.18 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBCE vs. VEGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBCE drawdown since its inception was -7.15%, smaller than the maximum VEGN drawdown of -34.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCE and VEGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBCE | VEGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -34.14% | +26.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.70% | -4.48% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.47% | -7.52% | +4.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.16% | — |
Volatility
MBCE vs. VEGN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBCE | VEGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.90% | 19.41% | +23.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.90% | 20.84% | +22.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.90% | 22.99% | +19.91% |
MBCE vs. VEGN - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBCE has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VEGN's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBCE vs. VEGN - Dividend Comparison
MBCE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEGN US Vegan Climate ETF | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.67% | 0.81% | 0.41% | 0.71% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, MBCE and VEGN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VEGN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEGN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for MBCE.
VEGN has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for MBCE.
MBCE tracks Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index, while VEGN tracks US Vegan Climate Index. They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and Beyond Investing. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for MBCE and 0.60% for VEGN.
Find the right allocation for MBCE and VEGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer