PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBCE vs. SPIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBCE vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MBCE

1D
1.38%
1M
0.54%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPIT

1D
0.41%
1M
0.75%
6M
18.85%
YTD
27.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBCE vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MBCE and SPIT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026

0.86

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBCE vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MBCE vs. SPIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MBCE vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBCE drawdown since its inception was -7.15%, smaller than the maximum SPIT drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCE and SPIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBCESPITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

-12.49%

+5.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.70%

-5.04%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.47%

-2.52%

-0.95%

Volatility

MBCE vs. SPIT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBCESPITDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.90%

26.32%

+16.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.90%

26.32%

+16.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.90%

26.32%

+16.58%

MBCE vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBCE has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBCE vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison

MBCE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MBCE and SPIT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPIT is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPIT is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for MBCE.

SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.62%, compared with 0.00% for MBCE.

They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for MBCE and 0.89% for SPIT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBCE and SPIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer