PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBCE vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBCE vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MBCE

1D
-5.51%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FMTM

1D
-4.66%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
25.27%
6M
26.43%
1Y
56.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBCE vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MBCE and FMTM is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBCE vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBCE

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBCE vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MBCE vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBCEFMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-3.09

2.06

-5.14

Drawdowns

MBCE vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBCE drawdown since its inception was -6.86%, smaller than the maximum FMTM drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCE and FMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBCEFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-12.12%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.86%

-4.91%

-1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-1.89%

-2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

Volatility

MBCE vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBCEFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.81%

23.34%

+22.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.81%

23.29%

+22.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.81%

23.29%

+22.52%

MBCE vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBCE has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBCE vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

MBCE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, MBCE and FMTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for MBCE.

FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.00% for MBCE.

MBCE is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for MBCE and 0.45% for FMTM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBCE and FMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer