MBCE vs. BIBL
MBCE (Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF) and BIBL (Inspire 100 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - MBCE tracks the Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index while BIBL tracks the Inspire 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MBCE charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BIBL.
Performance
MBCE vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBCE
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIBL
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 24.90%
- 6M
- 23.10%
- 1Y
- 38.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 10.29%
- 10Y*
- —
MBCE vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF | -1.39% |
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF | 1.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBCE and BIBL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBCE vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank
MBCE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BIBL
MBCE vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MBCE | BIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.38 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBCE vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBCE drawdown since its inception was -7.04%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCE and BIBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBCE | BIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.04% | -36.12% | +29.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.72% | -1.92% | -2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -7.00% | +4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility
MBCE vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBCE | BIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.69% | 16.44% | +31.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.69% | 19.76% | +27.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.69% | 21.11% | +26.58% |
MBCE vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBCE has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBCE vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison
MBCE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF | 0.94% | 1.01% | 0.92% | 1.02% | 0.98% | 17.87% | 1.67% | 1.30% | 1.49% | 0.31% |
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBCE and BIBL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BIBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BIBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for MBCE.
BIBL has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for MBCE.
MBCE tracks Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index, while BIBL tracks Inspire 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for MBCE and 0.35% for BIBL.
Find the right allocation for MBCE and BIBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer