MBCC vs. SGRT
MBCC (Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. MBCC is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. MBCC charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
MBCC vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBCC
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGRT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 56.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBCC vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF (MBCC) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBCC | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 3.81 | — |
Drawdowns
MBCC vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBCC | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -17.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -3.11% | — |
Volatility
MBCC vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBCC | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 33.41% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 33.41% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 33.41% | — |
MBCC vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBCC has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBCC vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
MBCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MBCC Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for MBCC.
SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for MBCC.
Their fees differ too: 1.25% for MBCC and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for MBCC and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer