PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBCC vs. QCLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBCC vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF (MBCC) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MBCC

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QCLR

1D
0.00%
1M
1.52%
YTD
1.40%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
11.39%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBCC vs. QCLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MBCC
QCLR

Technology

38.7%
53.8%

Healthcare

14.4%
4.2%

Financial Services

12.1%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
12.2%

Real Estate

7.9%
0.1%

Communication Services

7.8%
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
7.7%

Industrials

3.4%
2.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Energy

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

MBCC
38.7%
QCLR
53.8%

Healthcare

MBCC
14.4%
QCLR
4.2%

Financial Services

MBCC
12.1%
QCLR
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

MBCC
11.5%
QCLR
12.2%

Real Estate

MBCC
7.9%
QCLR
0.1%

Communication Services

MBCC
7.8%
QCLR
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

MBCC
4.2%
QCLR
7.7%

Industrials

MBCC
3.4%
QCLR
2.9%

Basic Materials

MBCC

-

QCLR
1.1%

Energy

MBCC

-

QCLR
0.6%

Utilities

MBCC

-

QCLR
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBCC vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBCC

QCLR
QCLR Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
QCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBCC vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF (MBCC) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MBCC vs. QCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBCCQCLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

Drawdowns

MBCC vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBCCQCLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

Volatility

MBCC vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBCCQCLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.42%

MBCC vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBCC has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBCC vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison

MBCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.68%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MBCC
Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
14.68%14.89%8.89%0.47%0.27%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, QCLR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QCLR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for MBCC.

QCLR has the higher dividend yield at 14.68%, compared with 0.00% for MBCC.

MBCC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QCLR is Nasdaq-100. MBCC tracks Kingsview Blue Chips Core Index, while QCLR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for MBCC and 0.60% for QCLR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBCC and QCLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer